A MONTH-LONG conference in New York to shore up the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and prevent the global spread of atomic weapons is faced with possible collapse because of wrangling over the goal of a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East.

Senior western diplomats are warning that unless agreement can be reached over the next few days on a way forward for Middle East talks, the NPT review conference could grind to a halt without anything to show for it. Failure to achieve any positive outcome would be a serious blow to the credibility of the international community's efforts to deal with pressing nuclear problems, particularly with regard to Iran.

At the centre of the crisis are highly sensitive ongoing negotiations on plans for a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East. The idea is being championed by Egypt and the Arab nations as a way of forcing Israel to admit publicly that it is in possession of nuclear arms as a first step towards eradicating those weapons.

Under a long-standing policy of ambiguity, Israel has never admitted possessing atomic weapons, though it is universally believed to do so. Israel is one of four countries that has refused to sign up to the NPT, and persuading Tel Aviv to attend any discussion on nuclear arms in the Middle East is proving difficult.

So far there is no sign that the Israeli government is prepared to budge, as it says it will only sign the treaty once a full Arab-Israel peace deal is achieved. A senior western diplomat said without Israel there could be no meeting on the nuclear-free zone, while Iran would also have to show up if the talks were to be credible given the confrontation over Tehran's nuclear enrichment programme.

Israel is under pressure from allies to conform on the issue, and talks are understood to be continuing with the US administration, which backs a nuclear-free zone. The diplomat added “Israel will attend if it thinks the cost of not attending will be higher than if it does.”

Parties close to the negotiations now fear if the Middle East plan fails to get off the ground then the Arab nations will act as a bloc at the New York conference — forcing it to end in failure, which has serious consequences.

“Two major crashes of the NPT review conference in 10 years, what would that say about our ability to take forward multilateral diplomacy?” a western diplomat said, referring to the collapse of the last conference in 2005.

— The Guardian, London

Opinion

Editorial

Quid pro quo
Updated 26 Jul, 2026

Quid pro quo

Accepting Israel would mean legitimising its violence against the Palestinians, as well as its neighbouring Arab states and Iran.
AI in government
26 Jul, 2026

AI in government

THE Prime Minister’s Office has announced the introduction of an AI-powered digital system and directed ministries...
Cautious optimism
26 Jul, 2026

Cautious optimism

THE latest polio surveillance figures offer some encouraging news regarding the difficult fight against polio. The...
Rampant lawlessness
Updated 25 Jul, 2026

Rampant lawlessness

THE brutal slaying of a judge and his guard in Mastung is the latest in a series of blood-drenched events that have...
Daily fuel pricing
25 Jul, 2026

Daily fuel pricing

THE government’s move to daily petroleum price adjustments should make fuel pricing more transparent and more...
The drug problem
25 Jul, 2026

The drug problem

WHILE Islamabad Police chase low-level peddlers, the capital’s kingpins have quietly taken their operations ...