UNITED NATIONS, May 30: Pakistan’s ambassador to the United Nations, Munir Akram on Wednesday defended Pakistan’s decision not to promise “no first nuclear strike” in case of an attack by India saying that it would give India a “license to kill” Pakistanis.

Addressing a news conference Akram said: “So long as the use of force is outlawed, we will accept ‘no first use of nuclear weapons’ also. India should not have the license to kill with the use of conventional weapons while our hands are tied.

Calling upon the United Nations Security Council to actively intervene in resolving the Kashmir dispute between the two countries, Akram said Pakistan would not attack India unless it was first attacked, it had never subscribed to the doctrine of “no first use” of nuclear arms.

As India’s armed forces are larger than Pakistan’s, anyone asking Pakistan to rule out first-strike of nuclear weapons would be “asking us in fact to accept the use of conventional force for India,” he said.

Asked about the Pakistan’s recent missile tests, he said that in the last five months, India had tested five missiles of varying ranges. “Nobody objected,” he said. “Why is it different when Pakistan tests?”

On the question of international monitors, along the line of control, Akram pointed out that Pakistan was ready to accept 300 international monitors along the LoC as proposed by a friendly country adding “we don’t even mind an impartial mechanism to be formed.”

He pointed out that Pakistan had proposed strengthening of the United Nations monitors along the LoC, which number 35 now, but India had rejected that outright.

Saying that India was “unable to crush freedom struggle” in Kashmir Akram said, India has resorted to the colonial powers line of last resort - which is to depict the freedom struggle as a struggle of terrorist.” This, he said, was contrary to international law.

It is contrary to the facts because it is a struggle by a people which arose from the promise of self-determination to them in the resolution of the Security Council.

Opinion

Rule by law

Rule by law

‘The rule of law’ is being weaponised, taking on whatever meaning that fits the political objectives of those invoking it.

Editorial

Isfahan strikes
20 Apr, 2024

Isfahan strikes

THE Iran-Israel shadow war has very much come out into the open. Tel Aviv had been targeting Tehran’s assets for...
President’s speech
20 Apr, 2024

President’s speech

PRESIDENT Asif Ali Zardari seems to have managed to hit all the right notes in his address to the joint sitting of...
Karachi terror
20 Apr, 2024

Karachi terror

IS urban terrorism returning to Karachi? Yesterday’s deplorable suicide bombing attack on a van carrying five...
X post facto
Updated 19 Apr, 2024

X post facto

Our decision-makers should realise the harm they are causing.
Insufficient inquiry
19 Apr, 2024

Insufficient inquiry

UNLESS the state is honest about the mistakes its functionaries have made, we will be doomed to repeat our follies....
Melting glaciers
19 Apr, 2024

Melting glaciers

AFTER several rain-related deaths in KP in recent days, the Provincial Disaster Management Authority has sprung into...