KARACHI, April 28: The Supreme Court was moved on Wednesday for leave to appeal the Sindh High Court order in the Shaista Almani case. Petitioner Khuda Bakhsh Almani submitted through Advocate Ghulam Qadir Jatoi that right from the first day the proceedings of the case were not confined to the parameters laid down by the constitution for the exercise of writ jurisdiction.

No detailed inquiry could have been held in the plea for production of the alleged detainees. The petitioner was "allowed to be humiliated by the non-governmental organizations" in the course of the proceedings.

The recording of the statements of the alleged detainees was also not fair. The petitioner's name was unduly deleted from the list of respondents, he maintained.

An SHC division bench had declared Shaista Almani and Balakhsher Maher 'sui juris' on March 30 and allowed them to decide on their future relationship as legally competent citizens. It did not rule on the validity or otherwise of their marriage as the issue was not before it for adjudication.

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...