KARACHI, Jan 8: The Sindh High Court asked the petitioners occupying land required for the construction of the Lyari Expressway project on Monday to vacate it by the first week of February.

About 22 people had moved a petition through Advocate Ghulam Qadir Jatoi complaining that their plots were being acquired for the expressway project without compensation.

They claimed that they were lawful sub-lessees of the plots and requested the court to restrain the city district government and the expressway project not to evict them from their property without payment of compensation at the market rate.

Contesting the petition, city government counsel Manzoor Ahmed submitted that 11 of the petitioners had already been compensated in accordance with an order passed and formula laid down by the high court while disposing of a number of identical petitions in 2002.

He said the petitioners had failed to produce any document whatsoever evidencing their title to the property in question.

In the absence of any lease or sub-lease they could only be treated as illegal occupants and encroachers yet the city government has paid them compensation in terms of the high court order.

A division bench comprising Justices Sarmad Jalal Osmany and Sajjad Ali Shah asked the city government to dispose of all applications for compensation in accordance with law as directed by the court in its order of 2002.

The issue of inadequacy of compensation would be decided in due course but the petitioners must vacate the land by the first week of February as ‘sufficient time has already lapsed’.

BAIL GRANTED: Justice Saiyed Zawwar Hussain Jaffery, meanwhile, granted bail to two accused booked under Section 22 (b) of the Emigration Ordinance in the sum of Rs200,000 each.

Complainant Abu Ubaida of Lahore lodged an FIR alleging that accused Farrukh Mehmood Janjua and Sajid Ali Mughal deprived him of lakhs of rupees for arranging a Malaysian visa and job.

The Federal Investigation Agency investigated the complaint and found that the accused were not authorized overseas employment promoters and were fleecing people by making false promises.

Appearing for the applicant accused, Advocate Mohammad Ali Abbassi argued that the FIR was lodged 10 months after the alleged payment.

Besides, his clients were abroad at the time when the payment was allegedly made to them in Pakistan.

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...