KARACHI: Mosque, mazar get stay

Published November 24, 2006

KARACHI, Nov 23: A division bench comprising Chief Justice Sabihuddin Ahmed and Justice Faisal Arab allowed appeals by a Shaheed-i-Millat Road plot owner and the CDGK against an interim order passed by a single judge in a suit to restrain the owner from seeking and the CDGK from sanctioning commercialisation of the plot.

Several residents of the neighborhood instituted a suit against the plot owner and the CDGK against commercialisation of the plot despite notification of the Shaheed-i-Millat Road as a commercial lane by the provincial government along with other roads, including Sharea Faisal and Tariq Road. Justice Nadeem Azhar Siddiqui granted an injunction in favour of the plaintiffs and the owner and the CDGK preferred an appeal against the interim order through advocates Abid S. Zuberi and Manzoor Ahmed. The plaintiff respondents, who also challenged the validity of CDGK bye-laws, were represented by advocate Rizwana Ismail.

The bench passed a consent order setting aside the impugned injunction to the extent that the CDGK would process the plot owner’s application for commercialisation and would decide the matter after hearing the plaintiff respondents. The question of the validity of the impugned rules in the pending suit could, meanwhile, be decided by the single judge without recording evidence.

STAY EXTENDED: The same bench extended a stay in favour of a madressah and mazar in PIB Colony threatened by the Lyari Expressway Project. Advocate Shaukat Ali Shaikh submitted that the mazar was constructed in 1969 after obtaining permission from the then deputy commissioner as provided by the law. Asked about the CDGK offer of an alternative site for the madressah, the counsel said it also housed a mosque, which could not be shifted. He maintained that the petitioner’s grievance was against the National Highway Authority and the CDGK was misleading the court. The bench adjourned the hearing to December 6.

PLOT OWNER SUMMONED: The bench comprising Justices Sarmad Jalal Osmany and Sajjad Ali Shah, meanwhile, asked the SHO of SITE to produce the owner of the plots (F-620 and F-621) on which a dump of toxic chemicals claimed the life of one person and caused injuries to 20 others, most of them children. The owner will be produced on November 28.

Advocate Arshad Tayebali, on behalf of Gharib Farooq, Chief Executive of M/s Gharibsons, submitted that he was wrongfully involved in the dumping of toxic waste as he had no chemical waste to dump. He had a chipboard factory located over a kilometer away from the dump. The owner of the plot on which the toxic wastes were heaped had not been implicated.

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...