Pakistan won’t allow India to weaponise water: Tarar

Published Updated
0

ISLAMABAD: Federal Infor­mation Minister Attaullah Tarar has warned that India’s decision to hold the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance could have implications for global transboundary water governance, urging the international community to take note of the “wider precedent”.

“We cannot allow India to weaponise water because it is the basic right of the 240 million people of Pakistan,” Mr Tarar said, highlighting that the controversial Indian move could have serious implications for other countries sharing water under similar frameworks.

The federal minister expressed these views at the launch of a report on the issue of Indus Water Treaty, organised by the Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad, on Wednesday.

While the 1960 IWT allocates the eastern rivers of Ravi, Beas and Sutlej to India and the western rivers of Indus, Jhelum and Chenab to Pakistan, New Delhi violated the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties by unilaterally putting the water-sharing accord in abeyance.

Information minister says India’s unilateral action on Indus treaty threatens global water governance

He said when the treaty was signed, the signatories “did not envisage that there would come a time a few decades down the line when conditions in India would deteriorate so much that they would be legally ignorant, morally bankrupt and devoid of ethics”.

Mr Tarar held that the IWT was legally binding upon both parties. “It contains stipulations that this legal instrument cannot be unilaterally revoked, rescinded, or altered,” he said.

He said the treaty could not be “unilaterally altered, revoked, rescinded or held in abeyance, for that matter, but even if there is a dispute, both the parties have to adhere to the terms and conditions of the treaty”.

He said the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) also “upheld Pakistan’s stance, giving legitimacy and strength to the argument that there cannot be a unilateral attempt to change the status of this treaty”.

In its August order, the PCA had backed Pakistan’s stance, declaring that the IWT between the two countries remained fully in force, as India had no justification for ending or suspending the agreement.

Mr Tarar said Pakistan effectively engaged the international community and presented a legal and diplomatic point of view as a nation-state that respected the rights of others. He also recalled Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s address at the recent UNGA session. “PM Shehbaz said the IWT is the lifeblood of our people and our region, and any attempt to usurp this right be treated as an act of war,” he recalled.

He said Pakistan’s position on the IWT remained “absolutely clear”, adding that the treaty was an “instrument of peace and stability for the region”, while India’s actions were “highly condemnable” and unjustifiable at a “legal, diplomatic, and moral level”.

Published in Dawn, October 1st, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Fixing bond markets
01 Oct, 2026

Fixing bond markets

THE plan to deepen the domestic local currency bond market by allowing the public to trade government securities...
Call centre rackets
01 Oct, 2026

Call centre rackets

A NUMBER of recent raids conducted by the authorities in different cities point to the growing threat fraudulent ...
Homeward bound
01 Oct, 2026

Homeward bound

FIVE months after Somali pirates captured an oil tanker carrying a 19-member multinational crew, Somali maritime...
Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...