LHC hears Junaid Hafeez's appeal in blasphemy case, seeks prosecution's arguments on admissibility of digital evidence

Published
1
A photo of the Lahore High Court — AFP/File
A photo of the Lahore High Court — AFP/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) took up former university lecturer Junaid Hafeez’s appeal against his death sentence in a blasphemy case on Tuesday, seeking arguments from the prosecution on the admissibility of electronic evidence.

Hafeez was sentenced to death in 2019 and his appeal against his conviction has been pending since 2020.

A two-judge bench, comprising Justices Sadiq Mahmud Khurram and Muhammad Jawad Zafar, took up the appeal on Tuesday as complainant’s lawyer, Advocate Athar Shah Bokhari, and Hafeez’s lawyer, Advocate Asad Jamal, appeared before the court.

The hearing began with the bench observing that formal notices had not been issued to the parties since the transfer of Hafeez’s appeal from the Multan bench to the principal seat.

The case was transferred on the request of Hafeez’s lawyer in December 2021.

During the hearing on Tuesday, the LHC issued notices on the appeal, which the lawyers for the prosecution and the complainant received in the court.

The court further stated that it would like to hear the prosecution on the admissibility of electronic evidence involved in the case and the Facebook page attributed to Hafeez.

It then decided to adjourn the hearing till Oct 7, but the complainant’s counsel sought a longer adjournment to prepare his arguments.

The bench then said it would announce the date of the next hearing later and eventually scheduled the hearing for Oct 10.

Hafeez — a former visiting lecturer at the Department of English Literature of the Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU) — was arrested by police on March 13, 2013 and his trial in the blasphemy case, linked to Facebook uploads, began in 2014.

He was sentenced to death by a Multan district and sessions court on December 21, 2019 on blasphemy charges and subsequently appealed his conviction in 2020.

At least seven judges were transferred through the course of Hafeez’s case. As many as 15 prosecution witnesses recorded their statements against Hafeez while 11 others were not called after being declared irrelevant.

The trial was shifted to the Multan Central Jail in April 2014 by the Punjab home department due to security concerns.

One of Hafeez’s previous lawyer, Rashid Rehman, was shot dead in May 2014 in his office. The month prior to it, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan had expressed serious concerns when death threats were extended to Rehman, also the special task force coordinator of the commission.

In December 2014, another lawyer representing Hafeez also received a threat letter from the militant Islamic State group, warning him to withdraw from the case.

The hearing of the appeal has also been deferred multiple times.

Opinion

Editorial

Reviewing ties
Updated 06 Nov, 2026

Reviewing ties

With the Democrats clawing back power in Congress, changes in America’s approach to global engagement are likely to occur.
Genuine engagement
06 Nov, 2026

Genuine engagement

THE PTI-led opposition alliance TTAP appears to have finally brought an initially reluctant Maulana Fazlur Rahman on...
Human bondage
Updated 06 Nov, 2026

Human bondage

Law enforcement and political quarters are notorious for protecting the perpetrators, instead of ensuring legal implementation. Systemic coercion will keep Pakistan from becoming a humane state.
Blue wave
Updated 05 Nov, 2026

Blue wave

While Trump does not usually learn from his errors, perhaps seeing the response of the American voters he may attempt a wiser course.
New LPG policy
Updated 05 Nov, 2026

New LPG policy

If the policy is enforced effectively, it could potentially help end shortages and slash prices. But the question remains whether it will.
Polio’s other victims
05 Nov, 2026

Polio’s other victims

FOR decades, Pakistan has vowed to eradicate polio. Billions have been spent on logistics and awareness drives. Yet...