Royal baubles

Published
4
The writer is an author.
The writer is an author.

GLITTERING baubles of gold and oversize jewels distinguish royalty from commoners. Had the Egyptian pharaoh Tutankhamun been buried without his regalia, he would have been just another anonymous handful of dust. He was a minor pharaoh compared to his wealthier predecessors. Their richer tombs were systematically denuded by brazen grave-robbers.

Descendants of the Aztec empire might still have the fabled treasures of their ancestors, had the greedy Spanish conquistadors not invaded and ravished Latin America in 1519-20. Countless Chinese imperial treasures were destroyed by Anglo-French invaders during the Second Opium War in 1860, when they ransacked the Old Summer Palace in Beijing. Anything precious that remained of China’s cultural heritage was smuggled out to Taiwan by Gen Chiang Kai-shek in 1949-50.

The magnificent jewels looted by Nadir Shah when he drained the imperial Mughal treasury in 1739 are stored today in the Bank Melli in Tehran. They underpin Iran’s currency. Post-Revolution Russians since 1922 have stored their imperial treasures in the Kremlin. The British Crown jewels would have been wealthier had Oliver Cromwell not melted and sold some of them during the brief period of Britain’s other commonwealth (1653-58). Modern rulers prefer to keep their tangible assets in real estate or tax-proof havens. Only royalty flaunts its higher status with bejewelled crowns and tiaras.

Royalty watchers are intrigued by the speed with which the present Queen Camilla is using the royal baubles left by her in-laws. One cache of Crown property was inherited by King Charles as monarch from his ancestress Queen Victoria. These include the Kohinoor and the Lahore Durbar diamonds and emeralds (purloined from the Sikhs), and gifts from obsequious maharajas. Another glittering hoard came from Charles’s great-grandmother — the acquisitive Queen Mary. Her appetite for jewellery was insatiable. When the Romanovs fled Russia in 1918 and were forced to sell their jewels, she bought the now famous Vladimir tiara from the Grand Duchess Marie Feodorovna in 1921, and a spectacular cabochon sapphire and diamond brooch from the exiled Empress Marie Feodorovna’s collection. Queen Mary lived long enough to bequeath these and other heirlooms directly to her granddaughter — the regnant Queen Elizabeth II. She skipped the less favourite Queen Elizabeth (later the Queen Mother).

Only royalty flaunts its higher status with crowns and tiaras.

A third group of jewellery came to King Charles from the bequest of Queen Alexan­dra. She died in 1925 and left some important jewels to the “future wife” of her grandson Edward (then Prince of Wales). His su­bs­­equent marriage to Mrs Wallis Sim­p­­son caused heartburn within the royal family. Many tactless attempts were made by Lord Mountbatten to wrest the jewellery from her. These are finally in Charles’s possession.

A fourth important group has a decidedly plebeian origin. In 1942, Dame Margaret Greville — believed to be the illegitimate daughter of a Scottish brewer from his cook — sent a tin trunk containing priceless jewellery to her friend Queen Elizabeth (later the Queen Mother). Despite the obvious defect in her pedigree, Dame Margaret had insinuated herself into royal circles. She hosted Elizabeth and her groom Albert (later George VI) during their honeymoon. Although she knew Queen Mary, she bypassed the greedy dowager and gave her collection instead to the daughter-in-law. In 1942, during the war, Queen Elizabeth, on opening the shimmering contents of the mundane trunk, wrote to Queen Mary: “I must tell you that Mrs Greville has left me her jewels, tho’ I am keeping THAT quiet for the moment!”

She wore those jewels sparingly in public, perhaps to avoid criticism from nascent re­­pu­blicans, and her en­­vious in-laws. She displayed them ful­ly only in the late 1950s after Queen Mary’s death.

Prominent amo­ngst them is a monumental diamond tiara commissioned by Dame Margaret from Boucheron in Paris in 1921. Matching it is a spectacular five-row festoon necklace, bought from Cartier. It sparkles with diamonds and emeralds set in platinum. Both have become a part of Queen Camilla’s regalia. Another Greville gift — a pair of diamond chandelier earrings — is worn often by Catherine Princess of Wales.

In 2023, at their coronation, King Charles and Queen Camilla, in deference to Charles’s down-scaled ‘green’ monarchy, required all female royals to wear “embroidered floral headpieces instead of diamonds”. Diamonds may be forever, but on this occasion, they were kept beyond their reach. Queen Camilla, however, a spry 80-year old, has exempted herself from her own rules. She appears determined to enjoy every carat in the royal vaults. A republican Cockney landlady once dismissed such overladen royals with the jibe: “If you were to smother me with diamonds, I too would look like them!”

The writer is an author.

www.fsaijazuddin.pk

Published in Dawn, September 17th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

After the talks
Updated 05 Oct, 2026

After the talks

Considering how close they came to a solution, govt and opposition teams should reconvene to give the talks another chance.
Child safety online
Updated 05 Oct, 2026

Child safety online

Pakistani children are spending more of their lives online, but the safeguards around them are not keeping pace.
Rising public debt
05 Oct, 2026

Rising public debt

Pakistan’s public debt has surged by 76pc to Rs86.7tr in four years, according to a new government report.
Yemen offensive
Updated 04 Oct, 2026

Yemen offensive

The best option, therefore, is for Muslim and Arab states to help restore the Saudi-Houthi ceasefire.
Growth transition
04 Oct, 2026

Growth transition

PRIME Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent call to move from stabilisation to growth, job creation and export ...
Protection at risk
04 Oct, 2026

Protection at risk

THE recent warning from UNHCR should alarm donor governments. Nearly 8.3m refugees and other forcibly displaced...