Judgement on election plea of PTI-backed candidate

Published
0
A voter with an ink mark on the thumb goes through paperwork to cast a vote during the general election in Karachi, on Feb 8, 2024— Reuters/File
A voter with an ink mark on the thumb goes through paperwork to cast a vote during the general election in Karachi, on Feb 8, 2024— Reuters/File

LAHORE: An election tribunal has issued a detailed judgement on dismissal of a petition filed by PTI-backed independent candidate Ruba Umar Dar challenging the victory of the PML-N’s Faisal Akram from PP-46, Sialkot, ruling that the petition failed to meet the mandatory legal requirements for verification under election law.

The one-member tribunal, comprising retired Justice Mehmood Maqbool Bajwa, dismissed the election petition without going into the merits of the tampering allegations, after respondent Akram — the returned candidate — raised a preliminary objection questioning the petition’s maintainability.

Ms Dar had assailed the Feb 8, 2024 election result, alleging that the returning officer (RO) colluded to prepare Form-45 in disregard of the results recorded by her polling agents. She alleged that the subsequent Forms 46 to 49 submitted to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) were based on this tampering. She asked the tribunal to set aside Akram’s election and declare her as the returned candidate, or cancel the results from 89 polling stations with a call for fresh polling in the constituency.

However, the tribunal found that the petition’s verification and supporting affidavits, filed under Section 144 of the Elections Act, 2017 and Order VI, Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, suffered from multiple defects. It rejected arguments that these were mere technicalities, holding that Sections 142, 143 and 144 of the Act are mandatory provisions and that the doctrine of “substantial compliance” could not be invoked to cure such lapses in an election petition. It noted that the law’s penal framework under Section 145(1) is designed to deter frivolous and unverified allegations.

Concluding that the petitioner failed to comply with Section 144(2)(a)(c) and 144(4) of the Act, the tribunal dismissed the petition.

Published in Dawn, August 16th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...
Climate challenges
Updated 13 Nov, 2026

Climate challenges

Pakistan cannot afford to confront its climate crises one disaster, one season and one international summit at a time.
Under fire
Updated 13 Nov, 2026

Under fire

KP police are increasingly vulnerable as they play a frontline role in ongoing operations against terrorists.
Used car imports
13 Nov, 2026

Used car imports

THE government’s effort to restrict used car imports appears to be faltering. So suggest the numbers. Despite...