An illusion

Published Updated
0

SOME political decisions solve problems. Others merely postpone them. India’s decision of Aug 5, 2019, sought to settle history itself. By revoking Articles 370 and 35A, New Delhi changed the status of occupied Jammu and Kashmir and fully integrated it into the Indian Union. Seven years later, however, the constitu- tional change has not led to political finality.

The Kashmir dispute predates these constitutional amendments by more than seven decades. Since 1947, wars have been fought, ceasefires negotiated, and diplomatic initiatives attempted, but the dispute has lingered on. India argues that the 2019 decision strengthened national unity, governance and development.

Pakistan totally rejects this position, maintaining that Kashmir remains an internationally disputed territory whose future should be determined in accordance with the relevant United Nations resolutions and the wishes of the Kashmiri people.

The greatest tragedy is that constitutional arguments often overshadow the people themselves. Generations of Kashmiris have lived amid political uncertainty, disrupted livelihoods, divided families and recurring violence. While governments debate sovereignty, ordinary people continue to bear the multifaceted cost of an unresolved conflict.

The international community has largely responded with undue caution, balancing strategic interests against calls for dialogue. Yet, history suggests that unresolved political disputes rarely disappear through legal measures alone.

State power might impose temporary order, but lasting peace rests on political legitimacy, dialogue and public consent. Constitutions provide legal frameworks, not political closure. Seven years after India made its controversial move, the constitutional landscape has changed, but the competing claims remain.

Kashmir continues to demonstrate a simple lesson of global political history. Legal finality cannot by itself resolve a long-standing dispute whose underlying political questions remain unanswered.

Dr Zafar Khan Safdar
Islamabad

Published in Dawn, August 14th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Taliban support
14 Aug, 2026

Taliban support

THE latest UN monitoring report analysing the activities of several transnational terrorist groups is unequivocal in...
Job policy for youth
14 Aug, 2026

Job policy for youth

STRIPPED of its rhetoric, the prime minister’s announcement of Pakistan’s first National Youth Employment Policy...
Jail improvements
14 Aug, 2026

Jail improvements

THE Punjab government is spending Rs5bn on modernising jail facilities in the province, but to what end? The...
AJK outlook
Updated 13 Aug, 2026

AJK outlook

AS the staggered polls for the AJK Legislative Assembly enter their final stretch, it appears that the PML-N is in a...
Food costs
13 Aug, 2026

Food costs

THE State Bank’s warning that domestic food prices could rise more than expected in the near term deserves urgent...
Denied a future
13 Aug, 2026

Denied a future

FIVE years after the Taliban returned to Kabul, the world is still issuing statements while a generation of Afghan...