Outdated consumer laws need revision

Published Updated

PAKISTAN’s e-commerce sector has really expanded rapidly over the past several years, but the legal framework meant to protect consumers within it has not kept pace. The result is a digital marketplace where fraud is common and meaningful recourse for the affected buyer is rare.

The country’s primary consumer legislation — the Consumer Protection Act of 2005 — and the provincial laws that followed it were written for physical marketplaces. These laws address defective products, false advertising and unfair trade practices in broadly applicable terms, but they were never designed with the specific mechanics of online commerce in mind.

Issues that are now routine in digital transactions — delayed or undelivered orders, counterfeit goods sold as genuine, misleading product listings, and the absence of any clear refund pathway — fall into a legal grey area that existing statutes barely address. The practical conse- quences of this gap are well documented.

Numerous online sellers offer identical products at identical prices, leaving buyers with little ability to distinguish a legitimate vendor from a fraudulent one. Some platforms provide no complaint mechanism at all. In cases where payment has already been collected, certain websites have been known to simply restrict the buyer’s access altogether, leaving no avenue for resolution.

Pakistan’s continued reliance on cash on delivery (COD), which is the dominant payment method, is itself a symptom of this trust deficit, with consumers preferring to pay only after physically receiving the goods. They do so because the alternative offers so little legal protection, if at all.

There is no clear framework establishing platform liability, meaning that market-places hosting third-party sellers face minimal legal obligation when those sellers defraud a buyer. Consumers falling prey to a fraudulent listing often have no identi-fiable party to pursue a complaint against. All they have is a storefront that may not even exist by the time a dispute is raised.

Addressing the issue requires legislative attention specific to digital commerce: mandatory disclosure requirements for online sellers, defined platform liability for marketplaces that knowingly host fraudulent vendors, and an accessible, enforceable redressal mechanism for online transactions. Pakistan’s e-commerce sector will continue to grow regardless of whether this gap is closed. Whether or not the consumers are protected is a separate question entirely, and it is one that the existing legal framework has yet to answer.

Maheen Zahra
Lahore

Published in Dawn, July 20th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

GB Assembly’s demand
Updated 21 Jul, 2026

GB Assembly’s demand

THE newly elected Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly last week adopted a unanimous resolution asking the centre to grant the...
Spain’s statement
21 Jul, 2026

Spain’s statement

IT was a one-sided affair for the most part. The FIFA World Cup 2026 concluded in the early hours of Monday for...
Slow death
21 Jul, 2026

Slow death

MANCHHAR Lake, which is situated at the foot of the Kirthar range, was once Pakistan’s largest freshwater body ...
Unmasking stability
Updated 20 Jul, 2026

Unmasking stability

THREE reports last Friday — a widening food trade gap, return to a current account deficit, and the government’s...
Flood data gap
20 Jul, 2026

Flood data gap

HAVING endured one of its worst floods last year — triggered by intense monsoons and compounded by sudden water...
Zero-dose alert
20 Jul, 2026

Zero-dose alert

ALTHOUGH Pakistan recently announced its first National Vaccine Policy, it will take time before the immunity gap ...