IHC judge transfers draw criticism from Islamabad bar

Published April 29, 2026 Updated April 29, 2026 08:09am

ISLAMABAD: Lawyers’ bodies in the capital have reacted sharply to the transfer of three judges from the Islamabad High Court (IHC), with the Islamabad Bar Council (IBC) on Tuesday raising concerns over the move, which it said lacked transparency, and warning that selective transfers could undermine judicial independence.

In a strongly worded statement, IBC Vice Chairman Ch Asif Irfan and Exe­cutive Committee Chairman Muhammad Zafar Khokhar demanded a “structured, periodic and across-the-board rotation policy” for IHC and subordinate court judges based on uniform criteria.

“The council has taken serious notice of the recent transfer of three judges from the IHC, which appears to be lacking transparency and raises concerns of mala fide intent,” the statement said. The council did not name the judges or specify when the orders were issued.

Under Article 200 of the Constitution, the president may transfer a high court judge to another high court on the chief justice’s advice. The bar argued that “isolated and non-uniform transfers, undertaken without any disclosed objective criteria” damaged public confidence and judicial integrity.

“Any rotation policy must be based on objective, uniform and transparent criteria, applicable equally to all judges,” the council said, adding that transfers must be “free from arbitrariness or extraneous considerations”.

Separately, the Islamabad High Court Bar Association (IHCBA) also took note of the recent transfers. While acknowledging that such measures are undertaken within the constitutional framework, the association emphasised that they should be exercised with uniformity, transparency and principled consistency across the board.

“The IHCBA underscores that decisions impacting the composition of the courts carry significant institutional importance and must be approached with due care. It is imperative that such measures do not, in any manner, undermine the independence of the judiciary, which remains a cornerstone of the rule of law and public confidence in the justice system,” the association said.

The association reaffirmed its commitment to upholding judicial independence and expected that all relevant authorities would continue to be guided by these fundamental principles.

The bar urged “competent authorities” to formulate a comprehensive rotation mechanism in the interest of “fair and transparent administration of justice”.

Published in Dawn, April 29th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Growth to stability
Updated 29 Apr, 2026

Growth to stability

THE State Bank’s decision to raise its key policy rate by 100 basis points to 11.5pc signals a shift in priorities...
Constitutional order
29 Apr, 2026

Constitutional order

FOLLOWING the passage of the 26th and 27th Amendments, in 2024 and 2025 respectively, jurists and members of the...
Protecting childhood
29 Apr, 2026

Protecting childhood

AN important victory for child protection was secured on Monday with the Punjab Assembly’s passage of the Child...
Unlearnt lessons
Updated 28 Apr, 2026

Unlearnt lessons

THE US is undoubtedly the world’s top military and economic power at this time. Yet as the Iran quagmire has ...
Solar vision?
28 Apr, 2026

Solar vision?

THE recent imposition of certain regulatory requirements for small-scale solar systems, followed by the reversal of...
Breaking malaria’s grip
28 Apr, 2026

Breaking malaria’s grip

FOR the first time in decades, defeating malaria in our lifetime is possible, according to WHO. Yet in Pakistan,...