Ceasefire extension

Published April 23, 2026

THOUGH the US has extended the Iran ceasefire — thanks largely to effective Pakistani diplomacy to prevent sliding back towards war — the situation in the Gulf remains extremely volatile. Amongst the biggest sticking points are the respective blockades of the Gulf: Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and the US blockade of Iranian ports.

Each side is expecting the other to blink first and lift the blockade, and until there is a satisfactory resolution to this issue, it is difficult to see peace talks scheduled in Islamabad going ahead. While Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif did meet the Iranian ambassador in the capital on Wednesday, at the time of writing there was no indication that Iran had decided on attending talks in Pakistan. Meanwhile, there were reports that the IRGC had seized at least two unauthorised vessels.

Although it would have been preferable if the US had lifted its blockade — and the Iranians had responded by ending their own closure — as a confidence-building measure along with the ceasefire extension, both sides, particularly Iran, should not let this chance at a diplomatic solution lapse. The Hormuz closure is a consequence of the war, not its main cause. The Iranians should consider returning to the table, especially when Pakistan is doing all it can to facilitate successful parleys.

Many of Tehran’s objections are justified; after all it was attacked by the US-Israeli combo, and not the other way around. But negotiations are the only way out of this quagmire, with the other choice being a ruinous return to war, which would be a disaster for the entire region. Iranian negotiators should bring all their points of contention to the table.

There needs to be substantive progress at the talks; they should not be a mere photo opportunity. And while the US is not helping matters by issuing threats to Iran, with President Donald Trump leading the pack with his provocative social media posts, the parties involved should not lose sight of the bigger picture. That remains addressing the core issues that have fuelled this war, and bridging the mistrust between Washington and Tehran as much as possible.

The nuclear issue is not impossible to resolve. But for any resolution, both sides must engage in good faith, and show up at the talks. If the US wants progress on the nuclear file, it must also offer a substantive non-aggression pact, promising not to attack Iran, while restraining its ally Israel.

Presently, much of the world opinion is with Iran, as the international community sees that it was the victim in this conflict. Yet if economic pain due to the blockades in the Gulf intensifies, then that sentiment may shift in the opposite direction, especially if Iran is seen as shunning negotiations.

Published in Dawn, April 23rd, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...