Ceasefire extension

Published
2

THOUGH the US has extended the Iran ceasefire — thanks largely to effective Pakistani diplomacy to prevent sliding back towards war — the situation in the Gulf remains extremely volatile. Amongst the biggest sticking points are the respective blockades of the Gulf: Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and the US blockade of Iranian ports.

Each side is expecting the other to blink first and lift the blockade, and until there is a satisfactory resolution to this issue, it is difficult to see peace talks scheduled in Islamabad going ahead. While Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif did meet the Iranian ambassador in the capital on Wednesday, at the time of writing there was no indication that Iran had decided on attending talks in Pakistan. Meanwhile, there were reports that the IRGC had seized at least two unauthorised vessels.

Although it would have been preferable if the US had lifted its blockade — and the Iranians had responded by ending their own closure — as a confidence-building measure along with the ceasefire extension, both sides, particularly Iran, should not let this chance at a diplomatic solution lapse. The Hormuz closure is a consequence of the war, not its main cause. The Iranians should consider returning to the table, especially when Pakistan is doing all it can to facilitate successful parleys.

Many of Tehran’s objections are justified; after all it was attacked by the US-Israeli combo, and not the other way around. But negotiations are the only way out of this quagmire, with the other choice being a ruinous return to war, which would be a disaster for the entire region. Iranian negotiators should bring all their points of contention to the table.

There needs to be substantive progress at the talks; they should not be a mere photo opportunity. And while the US is not helping matters by issuing threats to Iran, with President Donald Trump leading the pack with his provocative social media posts, the parties involved should not lose sight of the bigger picture. That remains addressing the core issues that have fuelled this war, and bridging the mistrust between Washington and Tehran as much as possible.

The nuclear issue is not impossible to resolve. But for any resolution, both sides must engage in good faith, and show up at the talks. If the US wants progress on the nuclear file, it must also offer a substantive non-aggression pact, promising not to attack Iran, while restraining its ally Israel.

Presently, much of the world opinion is with Iran, as the international community sees that it was the victim in this conflict. Yet if economic pain due to the blockades in the Gulf intensifies, then that sentiment may shift in the opposite direction, especially if Iran is seen as shunning negotiations.

Published in Dawn, April 23rd, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Wheat price dilemma
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Wheat price dilemma

A price no buyer is obliged or financially equipped to pay is only a number. Growers seem to have grasped this before the government did.
Encounter culture
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Encounter culture

Whether police actions in "encounters" were legitimate or unlawful can only be established through credible investigations.
Recognising distress
26 Oct, 2026

Recognising distress

THE deaths of two families in Karachi, being investigated as suspected murder-suicides, raise disturbing questions...
Prudent warning
Updated 25 Oct, 2026

Prudent warning

Muslim countries have warned against a new conflict. But will the war lobbies in Washington and Tel Aviv listen?
Party of one
25 Oct, 2026

Party of one

IT ill behoves a political party that claims to be the biggest and most popular in the country to be so mired in...
Reckless driving
25 Oct, 2026

Reckless driving

THERE is a lack of official data documenting the crisis, but even by the most conservative estimates, over a dozen...