• Case file ordered to be placed before CJ Dogar for constitution of a new bench in controversial tweets case
• Appellants argue delays in hearing are prolonging their incarceration

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday dissolved the bench hearing the appeals of human ri­­g­hts lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, against their conviction in a controversial tweets case, and ordered that the file be placed before Chief Justice Sardar Sarfaraz Dogar for the constitution of a new bench.

A sessions court had sentenced the two lawyers to a total of 17 years in prison on multiple charges in January, a day after their arrest in Islamabad in connection with a separate case.

Justice Muhammad Asif issued the or­­d­er on an application filed by the app­­ellants seeking an early hearing of their appeals and suspension of their sentences.

During the proceedings, the counsel for the appellants, Riasat Ali Azad, arg­ued that despite the matter being taken up on February 19, no effective date had been assigned for the hearing, prolonging the incarceration of his clients.

The court was informed that proceedings involving the same appellants had previously been entertained by a bench comprising Justice Mohammed Azam Khan.

The order noted that “in the interest of judicial consistency, continuity, and effective adjudication, the present appe­­al may also be placed before the said bench.”

Consequently, the court directed the office to place the case file before the chief justice for appropriate orders regarding reassignment of the matter.

The development comes days after the previous hearing on February 27, when the government had requested that the appeal be transferred to the court of Justice Azam Khan, arguing that a similar matter had previously been heard there.

The assistant attorney general submitted that it would be appropriate for the same bench to hear related matters.

However, the appellants’ counsel opposed the move at that time, maintaining that no such case was pending before any other court and noting that the present appeal had been heard by Justice Muhammad Asif since its inception.

Under Section 9 of Peca, both Ms Mazari and Mr Chattha were sentenced to five years of rigorous imprisonment and fined Rs5 million each, with an additional year in default.

Under Section 10, they were each han­ded 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment and fined Rs30 million, with two more years in default. Under Section 26-A, they received two years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs1m each, with six months’ additional jail time in case of non-payment. All sentences are to run concurrently.

On February 7, the couple had challenged the trial court’s order. In their appeals, they contended that the impug­ned judgement was passed in blatant violation of settled legal principles and mandatory procedural requirements.

Published in Dawn, March 3rd, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Collective security
Updated 12 Mar, 2026

Collective security

Regional states need to sit down and talk. They must also pledge and work towards collective security.
Spectrum leap
12 Mar, 2026

Spectrum leap

THE sale of 480 MHz of fifth-generation telecom spectrum for $507m is a major milestone in Pakistan’s digital...
Toxic fallout
12 Mar, 2026

Toxic fallout

WARS can leave environmental scars that remain long after the fighting is over. The strikes on Iran’s oil...
Token austerity
Updated 11 Mar, 2026

Token austerity

The ‘austerity’ measures are a ritualistic response to public anger rather than a sincere attempt to reform state spending.
Lebanon on fire
11 Mar, 2026

Lebanon on fire

WHILE the entire Gulf region has become an active warzone, repercussions of this conflict have spread to the...
Canine crisis
11 Mar, 2026

Canine crisis

KARACHI’S stray dog crisis requires urgent attention. Feral canines can cause serious and lasting physical and...