• State minister cites ‘security and governance issues’ as reason
• Ex-judge says such rule can’t be extended beyond six months
• PTI leader describes it as just ‘feeler’

ISLAMABAD: The federal government is seriously considering imposing governor’s rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, citing “security and governance issues” in the province as the reason for this potential move.

“It is the prerogative of the president to impose governor’s rule on the advice of the prime minister under Article 232 of the Con­s­titution. The federal government is seriously considering [this move],” said Minister of Sta­te for Law and Justice, Barrister Aqeel Malik, while speaking on a Geo News programme.

“There is serious concern about how long the people of KP can be kept helpless. Governor’s rule can be imposed for two months, but it can be extended,” he said.

He added that the fragile law and order situation, challenges on the border, poor governance, and the concerns of the people of KP demanded that appropriate measures be taken to address these problems.

The state minister said the provincial government was engaged in confrontational politics, leaving the people of the province helpless and in a miserable condition.

Allegations against CM

Like Information Minister Attaullah Tarar, Mr Malik also levelled allegations against KP’s Chief Minister Sohail Afridi, accusing him of being involved in drug production and trafficking.

“The government has credible evidence that poppy is being cultivated on the CM’s land in a tribal area,” he said.

The state minister maintained that CM Afridi, in a press talk on Sunday, had admitted that he owned land in the tribal area. “Now one has to see what is being cultivated on his land,” he said.

Mr Malik further stated that the government had some intelligence reports suggesting that the KP government wanted to sever the province’s road and rail links with other parts of the country.

Legal expert retired judge Shaiq Usmani said on a TV programme that after the imposition of governor’s rule, the Centre needed to have the move endorsed by a joint sitting of parliament.

He added that governor’s rule could not be extended beyond six months.

When asked whether the provincial government could challenge the imposition of governor’s rule in a court of law, he said it could be contested in any court.

However, he added that most likely the case would be heard by the recently formed Federal Constitutional Court.

‘Feeler’

Meanwhile, PTI Information Secretary Sheikh Waqas Akram said the federal government was not serious about the imposition of governor’s rule, calling it merely a “feeler” from the Centre.

He added that even if the government were serious about imposing governor’s rule, it would not deal a significant blow to the PTI.

Published in Dawn, December 1st, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Larijani’s killing
19 Mar, 2026

Larijani’s killing

THE US-Israeli attempt to wipe out Iran’s top leadership is not likely to have the intended effect of making the...
War’s hunger toll
19 Mar, 2026

War’s hunger toll

THE conflict between the US, Israel and Iran continues to widen with far-reaching repercussions.The UN’s World ...
Let them in
19 Mar, 2026

Let them in

THE government need not be so difficult. Former prime minister Imran Khan’s sons, Kasim and Sulaiman, have not ...
Exit strategy
Updated 18 Mar, 2026

Exit strategy

MOST members of the international community, particularly states in the greater Middle East, are gravely concerned...
Unsafe trains
18 Mar, 2026

Unsafe trains

SUNDAY’S accident involving the Shalimar Express has once again brought into sharp focus the deep structural and...
Disappointment in Dhaka
18 Mar, 2026

Disappointment in Dhaka

FOR a side looking for lift-off after a disappointing T20 World Cup, it was despair for Shaheen Shah Afridi’s ...