ISLAMABAD: Dismissing an appeal against the Sindh High Court order, the Supreme Court has ruled that the state must ensure every Pakistani woman receives her rightful share of inheritance.

The apex court also called for a mechanism to help them (women) secure this “divinely bestowed” right.

“It is incumbent upon the state under the Constitution and the clear Injunctions of Islam, to ensure the effective and unfettered realisation of women’s right to inheritance,” the court order read.

The observation came in a seven-page judgement released on Saturday, authored by Justice Athar Minallah for a case heard by him and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan on August 29. The verdict was authored before Justice Minallah resi­gned as a judge on November 13, criticising the newly passed 27th Amendment that has practically replaced the SC with the Federal Constitutional Court as the country’s apex judicial platform.

SC Justice Minallah wrote the judgement before tendering his resignation over 27th Amendment issue

In its verdict, the SC bench dismissed an appeal filed by Abrar Hussain against a March 3, 2023, order of the Sindh High Court (SHC). The high court had rejected his plea cha­llenging a 2021 order that had also refused his appeal against a 2019 trial court decision.

The case

The case pertained to a pro­perty dispute between Hussain and his sister Bibi Shahida, who had filed a complaint in March 2015. Shahida said she repe­atedly demanded her share after her father passed away in 2002, as well as her two other siblings later on, but Hussain refused to give it.

Hussain “took exclusive pos­session of the property; thereby depriving the other legal heirs of their lawful shares”, the SC judgement observed.

“The petitioner (Hussain) had no case on merits and yet persisted in litigation, thereby prolonging the deprivation of his siblings of their lawful inheritance, which devolved upon them on 1.1.2002, the date of their father’s demise,” Justice Minallah wrote.

‘Attempt to delay’

“The challenge before this court was nothing more than an attempt to delay and frustrate the rights of the other legal heirs, amounting to a mere abuse of process,” he noted.

The state had a constitutional duty to ensure that “every woman is informed of, and enabled to claim her rightful share in inheritance without delay, fear or dependence on lengthy litigation”, the judgement read.

It added that the state must establish a “proactive and accessible mechanism through which women can be identified, reached out to,” and assisted in securing their lawful entitlements.

“Furthermore, those who, through coercion, deceit, or undue influence, deprive women of this divinely bestowed right must be held accountable under the law and made answerable,” Justice Minallah stressed.

The judgement also referred to the Federal Shariat Court’s (FSC) landmark ruling in March this year, wherein it declared that any custom — such as of ‘Chaddar’, ‘Parchi’ or ‘Haq Bakhshwai’ — that deprived women of inheritance right was “un-Islamic” and had no legal standing whatsoever.

The SC judgement observed that the right to inheritance was “not a concession granted by human law but a divinely ordained command, explicitly declared in the Holy Quran”. “Any denial or obstruction of this right is, therefore, not merely unlawful but a transgression against Divine Will,” it stated.

The ruling, echoing the FSC’s verdict, emphasised that “cultural or societal practi­ces that deprive women of their rightful inh­er­itance are rooted neither in faith nor in justice”.

It termed such customs “remnants of ignorance which the message of Islam came to abolish”, and noted that the state bore a “sacred constitutional duty to uproot such practices”.

“A society that turns a blind eye to deprivation of inheritance rights to its women defies the spirit of Constitution and Comm­and of Almighty Allah,” the ruling stated. “A state that fails to safeguard the inheritance rights to its women fails in its duty to uphold the principles of equity, faith and justice.”

The SC in its short order had imposed a cost of Rs500,000 on Hussain, which was to deposited with the SC registrar within seven days. “It is directed that the amount so deposited shall be distributed amongst the legal heirs declared by the trial court,” the SC judgment reiterated.

Published in Dawn, November 17th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Growth to stability
Updated 29 Apr, 2026

Growth to stability

THE State Bank’s decision to raise its key policy rate by 100 basis points to 11.5pc signals a shift in priorities...
Constitutional order
29 Apr, 2026

Constitutional order

FOLLOWING the passage of the 26th and 27th Amendments, in 2024 and 2025 respectively, jurists and members of the...
Protecting childhood
29 Apr, 2026

Protecting childhood

AN important victory for child protection was secured on Monday with the Punjab Assembly’s passage of the Child...
Unlearnt lessons
Updated 28 Apr, 2026

Unlearnt lessons

THE US is undoubtedly the world’s top military and economic power at this time. Yet as the Iran quagmire has ...
Solar vision?
28 Apr, 2026

Solar vision?

THE recent imposition of certain regulatory requirements for small-scale solar systems, followed by the reversal of...
Breaking malaria’s grip
28 Apr, 2026

Breaking malaria’s grip

FOR the first time in decades, defeating malaria in our lifetime is possible, according to WHO. Yet in Pakistan,...