Paralympics’ vote to lift Russian suspension ‘bold step’ as conflict rages

Published October 1, 2025
MILAN: An artist performs in the Olympic and Paralympic Village of the Milano-Cortina Winter Olympic Games 2026 on Tuesday.—AFP
MILAN: An artist performs in the Olympic and Paralympic Village of the Milano-Cortina Winter Olympic Games 2026 on Tuesday.—AFP

PARIS: The International Para­lympic Committee’s decision to lift the temporary suspension of Russia and Belarus is a “bold step” but “many will argue it is premature” while the conflict continues, a former IOC executive told AFP.

The vote at the IPC’s general assembly in Seoul on Saturday was a close-run thing but the narrow majority of 51.7 per cent potentially opens the way for Russian and Belar­usian athletes to compete under their own flags at the Winter Para­lympics in Milan-Cortina next year.

Russia invaded Ukraine over three years ago, in February 2022, and peace appears a distant hope — Moscow unleashed a massive drone and missile attack against Ukraine lasting 12 hours overnight Saturday.

Terrence Burns, a former IOC marketing executive, told AFP the IPC was trying to perform a delicate balancing act.

“It’s a bold and consequential and controversial step,” the American said. “The IPC is trying to balance athlete rights, sporting principles, and moral legitimacy.

“But yes, many will argue it is premature while the conflict continues and civilians suffer.

“The optics are very sensitive, and this won’t be judged merely in sporting terms.”

The IPC’s change of tack contr­asted to that of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), whose Executive Board earlier this month maintained the status quo from the 2024 Paris Olympics and Para­lympics, with Russians and Bela­rus­ians competing as neutral athletes.

Burns, who since leaving the IOC has played a role in five successful Olympic city bids, said the IPC vote will “almost certainly reverberate” at IOC headquarters in Lausanne, where Kirsty Coventry assumed the reins as president in June.

“Although the IOC and IPC are separate, the public and media will view them as connected players,” Burns said.

“The IOC under President Coventry is already signalling a more dialogue-driven approach to reintegration questions.”

The IOC said on Monday it “acknowledged” the IPC’s decision.

‘PANDORA’S BOX’

Russia was suspended by the IOC in 2023 for violating the Olympic Charter by incorporating sports councils in four regions in eastern Ukraine.

However, at the most recent IOC Executive Board meeting this month the IOC “committed to finding a pathway for every NOC to participate... in the Dakar 2026 Youth Olympic Games”.

Burns, though, believes the IOC might have a tough task justifying Russia returning to the fold for that event in Dakar.

“That’s a bit of a minefield,” he said. “The Youth Olympics are supposed to foster inclusion and positive values among young people.

“But any decision to include or exclude has to stand up to scrutiny, especially if the country in question faces credible allegations like child abduction.

“The IOC will have to show consistency, transparency, and moral grounding if it goes that route.”

Michael Payne, a former head of the IOC’s marketing, said on a global level sport “is in a very difficult, if not impossible, situation”.

“Arguably one of the greatest threats facing the movement is the increasing political weaponisation of sport,” the 67-year-old Irishman told AFP.

“If your fundamental mission is to bring the world together, through peaceful sports competition, once you start suspending one nation for war or atrocities, where do you stop? You open a Pandora’s box.”

Payne pointed out that Coventry and her top leadership had decided to form a working group to review the overall mission of the IOC “and how to manage the increasing conflicts around the world”.

Ukraine’s Sports Minister Matviy Bidnyi reacted with disbelief at the IPC’s decision, telling AFP he hoped the Italian hosts of the Winter Paralympics and the organising committee would refuse to go along with it.

Published in Dawn, October 1st, 2025

Opinion

A changed world

A changed world

The phrase ‘security provider’ sounds impressive but there is little clarity on what it means for the country.

Editorial

Bannu attack
Updated 12 May, 2026

Bannu attack

The security narrative and strategy of the KP government diverges considerably from the state’s position.
Cotton crisis
12 May, 2026

Cotton crisis

PAKISTAN’S cotton economy is once again facing a crisis that exposes the country’s flawed agricultural and...
Buddhist heritage
12 May, 2026

Buddhist heritage

THE revival of Buddhist chants at the ancient Dharmarajika Stupa in Taxila after nearly 1,500 years is much more ...
New regional order
Updated 11 May, 2026

New regional order

The fact is that the US has only one true security commitment in the Middle East — Israel.
A better start
11 May, 2026

A better start

THE first 1,000 days of a child’s life often shape decades to come. In Pakistan, where chronic malnutrition has...
Widening gap
11 May, 2026

Widening gap

PAKISTAN’S monthly trade deficit ballooned to $4.07bn last month, its highest level since June 2022, further...