NA session adjourned shortly after Omar Ayub criticises last night’s steamrolled legislation

Published November 5, 2024
Opposition Leader Omar Ayub Khan speaks during a National Assembly session on November 5. — X/NAofPakistan
Opposition Leader Omar Ayub Khan speaks during a National Assembly session on November 5. — X/NAofPakistan

A National Assembly session was adjourned indefinitely on Tuesday after Opposition Leader Omar Ayub Khan’s remarks on last night’s swift legislation were expunged from the record.

Shortly after the session began, Ayub, representing the PTI-led opposition, criticised the steamrolling of six bills a day ago, calling it a “shameful incident” and branding the ruling coalition a “government of thieves”.

Deputy Speaker Mir Ghulam Mustafa Shah promptly intervened, ordering the remarks removed from the record.

The government had passed crucial legislation — pertaining to the higher judiciary and the tenure of the services chiefs — through both houses of the parliament on Monday, despite vociferous protest by the PTI-led opposition.

Following Ayub’s remarks, the livestream on the NA’s YouTube channel then went blank, before being removed from the platform altogether. The livestream on PTV Parliament’s YouTube channel also stopped showing the session as soon as Ayub began his speech.

The NA livestream then resumed at 11:48am, before the session was adjourned indefinitely.

Shah said NA Speaker Ayaz Sadiq had yesterday spoken of giving the floor to PTI Chairman Gohar Khan but the proceedings had to be held amid noisy protests.

The deputy speaker then ordered that Ayub’s mic be turned on, but the livestream was again cut off as soon as the PTI MNA started speaking.

The livestream then resumed when independent MNA Aurangzeb Khan Khichi, one of the PTI-backed lawmakers to vote in favour of the 26th Amendment against the party lines, was given a chance to speak.

Responding to PTI’s allegations that he “took money” in return for his vote, Khichi said: “Standing beneath these pure names of Allah, I say that may Allah destroy me if I have taken even a single penny [as bribe].”

The MNA said that Ayub had made allegations of PTI members being pressured and intimidated to vote in favour of the Amendment, adding: “This means that despite knowing about all this, he is feigning ignorance.

 Independent MNA Aurangzeb Khan Khichi speaks in NA on November 5. — YouTube/NaofPakistan
Independent MNA Aurangzeb Khan Khichi speaks in NA on November 5. — YouTube/NaofPakistan

“This is true that our party leadership has sold us,” Khichi alleged.

He went on to criticise the PTI for using the tactic of “creating noise to make themselves heard”, before asserting he won “90,000” votes compared to some 2,500 when PTI contested against him.

All the while Khichi spoke, the PTI lawmakers continued thumping their desks in protest, resulting in the deputy speaker calling for order to be restored and then adjourning the session indefinitely.

According to a video shared on the NA’s X and Instagram accounts, speaking on the floor, Ayub criticised the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), saying the failed PIA privatisation bid was a “slap” on the government’s face.

He lamented an expected increase in gas prices, as well as power and gas load-shedding. “They have not brought the current account deficit under control, [rather] imposed restrictions on import,” Ayub claimed.

Parliamentary process circumvented: Raza Rabbani

Separately, former Senate chairman Raza Rabbani also assailed yesterday’s rushed legislation, saying the parliamentary process was circumvented.

“Yesterday was a dark day in the history of parliament, when important legislation was passed by suspension of rules by the government,” he said in a statement.

“History will hold all of us responsible for circumventing the parliamentary and democratic process,” the former PPP senator asserted.

“The bills have a important impact on the judiciary and the armed forces, as a consequence on the politics, and democratic process,” he highlighted.

Rabbani said such legislation was “not an expression of the sovereignty of parliament or the Constitution, but an expression of fear”. “A frightened Parliament or democratic system is weak and its existence is always under threat.”

He said the bills should have been sent to the standing committees concerned for review, after which both houses should have taken them up and voted upon them after a debate.

Govt steamrolls bills on SC, services chiefs

The six bills were passed from the National Assembly on Monday within 24 minutes, and then from the Sen­ate in just 16 minutes, without allowing any debate.

They sought to ext­end the tenure of the chi­efs of the country’s thr­ee armed forces and inc­r­ease the number of jud­ges in the Supreme Court and the Islamabad High Court (IHC).

Late-night media reports suggested that Acting President Yousuf Raza Gillani had signed all six bills into law, but there was no official word from the Presidency until going to press.

In light of the ‘Supreme Court Number of Judges (Amendment) Bill 2024’, the number of judges, including the chief justice, in the apex court has incre­ased from 17 to a maximum of 34.

Similarly, through the ‘Islamabad High Court (Amendment) Bill 2024’, the number of judges there has increased from nine to 12.

The bills regarding the judiciary were tabled in both houses by Law Minis­ter Azam Nazeer Tarar, while those related to the services chiefs were introduced by Defence Minister Khawaja Asif through supplementary agendas, after suspending the rules.

No debate allowed

As soon as the law minister introduced the first bill related to the number of SC judges and highlighted some salient features, NA Spe­a­ker Ayaz Sadiq gave the floor to Bar­r­ister Gohar.

 Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar speaks in the NA on Nov 4, 2024. — X/@NAofPakistan
Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar speaks in the NA on Nov 4, 2024. — X/@NAofPakistan

But the minister protested, dec­laring that he would not allow the opposition member to speak without first giving his point of view. In an apparent effort to provoke the opposition, the minister categorically ann­ounced that he would not let Barrister Gohar speak, if the speaker did not allow him to finish his speech.

Eventually, the speaker relented and allowed the law minister to continue, telling the protesting opposition members to hear out the minister. The speaker’s action prompted a strong protest by opposition members, who started gathering in front of his dais.

The opposition lawmakers raised full-throated slogans targeting the government and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who was surrounded by several treasury members to avert any possibility of physical contact.

The members also tore up the copies of the bills and agendas and tossed them in the air.

At one point, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar was seen exchanging hot words with PTI’s Shahid Khattak when the former started replying to slogans raised by opposition members.

Salient features of the six bills

Changes to Army, Air Force and Navy acts

  • Tenure of all three services chiefs (chief of army staff, chief of air staff and chief of naval staff) to be five years, instead of three.

  • Retirement age bar of 64 years (for generals, air chief marshals and admirals) won’t apply to these three functionaries; extensions, re-appointments for these posts (if any) will also be for five years.

  • Tenure of Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff remains unchanged, at three years.

Changes to SC Practice & Procedure Act

  • Three-member body to fix cases reconstituted to include CJP, senior-most SC judge and senior judge of constitutional benches.

  • Three-member committee comprising senior judge of constitutional benches and next two most senior judges to decide — through speaking order — whether matter falls within purview of constitutional bench, or not.

  • Unless required by law, every matter before SC to be heard on ‘first in, first out’ basis, ie in chronological order.

Changes to number of judges

  • Strength of IHC raised from nine to 12 judges.

  • Maximum strength of SC raised to 34 judges, including the CJP.

Opinion

Editorial

Competing narratives
03 Dec, 2024

Competing narratives

Rather than hunting keyboard warriors, it would be better to support a transparent probe into reported deaths during PTI protest.
Early retirement
03 Dec, 2024

Early retirement

THE government is reportedly considering a proposal to reduce the average age of superannuation by five years to 55...
Being differently abled
03 Dec, 2024

Being differently abled

A SOCIETY comes of age when it does not normalise ‘othering’. As we observe the International Day of Persons ...
The ban question
Updated 02 Dec, 2024

The ban question

Parties that want PTI to be banned don't seem to realise they're veering away from the very ‘democratic’ credentials they claim to possess.
5G charade
Updated 02 Dec, 2024

5G charade

What use is faster internet when the state is determined to police every byte of data its citizens consume?
Syria offensive
Updated 02 Dec, 2024

Syria offensive

If Al Qaeda’s ideological allies establish a strong foothold in Syria, it will fuel transnational terrorism.