FO criticises ‘uninformed, undiplomatic’ comments

Published
0

ISLAMABAD: The Foreign Office on Thursday rejected observations made by the UN Human Rights chief regarding judicial independence, urging him to focus on his mandate instead of making uninformed comments as it also denounced a letter from US Congress members to President Biden criticising Pakistan’s human rights and governance record, calling the move undiplomatic.

“We reject these base­less insinuations and advise the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to concentrate on actual and severe human rights violations, particularly where international human rights laws have been rendered ineffective or where draconian laws have been enacted to oppress occupied peoples,” Foreign Office spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch said at a weekly media briefing.

The spokesperson’s sharp response followed a statement by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk who raised concerns over the recently enacted 26th Amendment to the Constitution, which followed intense political controversy and debate.

In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Turk expressed concern that the constitutional amendments were adopted hastily, without broad consultation or debate, potentially undermining the judiciary’s independence.

Rejects Volker Turk’s remarks about judicial independence; slams US lawmakers’ letter calling for Imran’s release

In response, spokesperson Baloch said the OHCHR’s conclusions were based on “misinformation and an inaccurate understanding of developments in Pakistan,” resulting in “unwarranted and misplaced conclusions”.

She said that these statements were grounded in media reports, social media posts, and speculative analyses of a political nature.

Similarly, the FO spokesperson expressed the hope that the US Congress would play a constructive role in strengthening Pakistan-US ties instead of becoming entangled in domestic political controversies.

“Comments on Pakistan’s domestic affairs violate inter-state conduct and diplomatic norms. We believe such letters and statements are counterproductive and do not align with the positive dynamics of Pakistan-US bilateral relations,” she said.

More than 60 US lawmakers have urged President Joe Biden to advocate for the release of political prisoners in Pakistan, including former prime minister Imran Khan.

This marks the first collective appeal by US Congress members advocating for the release of political prisoners in Pakistan, including Imran Khan.

The FO spokesperson rejected the lawmakers’ letter, asserting that it was based on an incorrect understanding of Pakistan’s political situation.

Published in Dawn, October 25th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

The jurisdiction of the two courts and a mechanism for settling disputes between them should be spelt out in law, not left to judges to fight over.
Growing crisis
15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

AN emergency can be judged by the speed with which it draws an effective response. The National Population Council’s...
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...