THE issue of Fiverr, a multinational online marketplace, and the hypocrisy surrounding the growing so-called ‘cancel culture’ is rather intriguing. I have friends who support at various forums the causes that are important to Muslims, like, say, the Palestine issue. Almost all of them also support boycott campaigns against various international brands. Surprisingly, many of them continue to be active on Fiverr, which is an Israel-owned enterprise registered and based in Tel Aviv. That many Pakistanis earn their living through the platform using fake names and photos on the platform is an ethical concern in itself.

The international economy operates independently of emotional or idealistic considerations, functioning as a neoliberal entity where market forces are the primary drivers. In Pakistan, a significant portion of global brands are locally-owned and contribute to the local economy. When these brands and outlets were boycotted, it negatively affected the local workers who lost their jobs and suffered econo- mically. Yet, there was little consideration given to how these workers would be impacted. Ironically, the very people calling for a boycott continued to associate themselves with Fiverr. This was sheer hypocrisy.

As things turned out, Fiverr and other such enterprises slowed down their operations in Pakistan due to a troubling internet infrastructure. This resulted in the loss of earning opportunities for Pakistani digital workers, which has been roundly condemned by Pakistani fre- elancers, and rightly so. I find it ironic, however, that those involved in campaigns against international chains are now affected themselves.

The situation raises questions about the moral consistency of their actions. It is important to realise that our actions based on emotions or idealism can have a more significant impact on us than on the target of our actions, especially in the context of the international market system.

Moving forward, we need to focus on developing strong and vibrant local economies, and fostering a mindset that considers the long-term impact of our actions. Boycotting or cancelling things may have short-term effects, but in the long run, the international market is bound to prevail, and we will be the ones to suffer econ- omically. We need to understand and digest the dynamics of the digital age.

Abdul Kareem
Larkana

Published in Dawn, August 31st, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

The May war
Updated 06 May, 2026

The May war

Rationality demands that both states come to the table and discuss their grievances, and their solutions in a mature manner.
Looking inwards
06 May, 2026

Looking inwards

REGULAR appraisals by human rights groups and activists should not be treated by the authorities as attempts to ...
Feeling the heat
06 May, 2026

Feeling the heat

ANOTHER heatwave season has begun, and once again, the state is scrambling to respond to conditions it has long been...
Energy shock
Updated 05 May, 2026

Energy shock

The longer the crisis persists, the more profound its consequences will be.
Unchecked HIV
05 May, 2026

Unchecked HIV

PAKISTAN’S HIV surge is no longer a slow-burning public health concern. It is now a system failure unfolding in...
PSL thrills
05 May, 2026

PSL thrills

BY the end of it all, in front of fans who had been absent for almost the entire 11th season of the Pakistan Super...