ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Monday referred journalist Arshad Sharif’s murder case back to the three-judge committee constituted under the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023 to re-fix it before a five-judge bench.

Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, who was heading a three-judge bench, noted that the case has been fixed before the smaller bench even though a five-judge larger bench had heard it earlier.

Since Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail and Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar were also members of the larger bench earlier, he observed that the case would be fixed for hearing subject to the availability of the two judges.

Former Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial had initiated the suo motu proceedings into the tragic killing of the journalist in Kenya.

On Monday, Attorney General for Pakistan Mansoor Usman Awan told the court that a draft of the Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) designed to seek a formal assistance from the Kenyan authorities for having access to suspects involved in the tragic killing of Arshad Sharif was ready.

The next meeting of the cabinet was expected to approve the MLA draft, the AGP said.

Also, at the last hearing on June 13, 2023, the AGP had apprised the court that a proper MLA was being drafted and its final draft would be placed before the cabinet for its final approval.

When the court asked whether a decision from the Kenyan court had also come, the AGP replied in the affirmative.

Three weeks ago, the Kenyan High Court in Kajiado had ruled that the 2022 killing of Pakistani Arshad Sharif by Kenyan law enforcement personnel was unlawful.

The SC, however, said at the moment the court would not go into the merits of the case.

At the hearing, Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui reminded the court that he had also moved an application on behalf of the journalist’s mother. Those claiming to be aware of the culprits behind the murder should be called by the court, he said. He reminded the court of the role of the “facilitator” that it pledged to carry out in the matter.

The counsel also requested the court to re-fix the matter within two weeks, but Justice Shah observed that the re-fixing of the case depended upon the availability of the judges.

The hearing, however, was then adjourned for an indefinite period.

Published in Dawn, July 30th, 2024

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.