Imran, Bushra’s sentences suspended in Toshakhana case

Published
0

ISLAMABAD: A bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday suspended the sentences of former prime minister Imran Khan and his spouse, Bushra Bibi, in the Toshakhana reference.

On January 31, an Islamabad accountability court convicted the couple in a case filed by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) for retaining expensive jewellery from the Toshakhana, after paying a nominal price.

They were sentenced to 14 years imprisonment each, along with a fine of Rs1.54 billion on both of them. The conviction also barred them from holding public office for ten years. Mr Khan and his wife had challenged their convictions in February.

On Monday, an IHC division bench comprising Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb suspended the sentences after the NAB special prosecutor did not oppose the plea.

IHC to hear appeals against ex-PM, Qureshi’s cipher conviction today

Barrister Ali Zafar appeared as the counsel for the ex-premier and his spouse, while NAB prosecutor Amjad Pervaiz was also present.

Barrister Zafar had requested the court to also set aside the conviction. However, the bench noted that since an appeal seeking similar relief for Mr Khan in another case was pending before the Supreme Court, the IHC could not set aside the conviction.

The hearing on appeals against conviction will continue after Eidul Fitr.

The same bench would also take up the appeals against conviction of Mr Khan and former foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi in the cipher case today (Tuesday).

The court is scheduled to hear the defence counsel’s arguments from 1pm to 4pm.

While hearing appeals against the Toshakhana reference, the IHC CJ remarked that the proceedings in the cipher case might conclude in the next two to three hearings.

The former prime minister and first lady were accused by NAB of retaining expensive ‘Graff’ jewellery worth Rs300m along with Rs9m accessories.

Mr Khan had contended that the evaluation of gifts done by NAB was based on the estimates of a part-time salesman. He claimed his legal team had the evidence of the real value of the jewellery set, which they could corroborate with the appraiser if allowed the cross examination.

This wasn’t allowed as then-accountability court judge Mohammad Bashir closed the defence counsel’s right to cross-examine witnesses.

Published in Dawn, April 2nd, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Regional security
Updated 28 Oct, 2026

Regional security

Iran and the Makkah pact states should pledge not to let external actors use their soil to launch aggression against each other.
Rate hike
28 Oct, 2026

Rate hike

THE SBP’s decision to raise its policy rate by 50 basis points to 12pc was largely expected. It is also justified...
Press solidarity
28 Oct, 2026

Press solidarity

PAKISTAN’S journalists have seldom lacked organisations speaking in defence of press freedom. What has been ...
Privatisation framework
Updated 27 Oct, 2026

Privatisation framework

The proposed merger of the Privatisation Commission and the Public-Private Partnership Authority (P3A) into a single institution is a sensible move.
Chromebook scheme
Updated 27 Oct, 2026

Chromebook scheme

Technology can widen opportunity, but only when it is tied to good teaching, reliable connectivity and clear educational purpose.
Dengue season
27 Oct, 2026

Dengue season

ANOTHER dengue outbreak looms over the country for reasons of lack of preparedness and negligence. This month’s...