ISLAMABAD: The Special Court (Official Secrets Act) conducting the trial of former prime minister Imran Khan and ex-foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi has barred coverage of its proceedings on all mainstream media outlets, as well as the social media.

On Thursday, Judge Abual Hasnat Mohammad Zulqarnain accepted the prosecution’s plea — moved under Section 14 of the Official Secrets Act — to exclude the general public from the hearing of the cipher case.

As per this section, the prosecution may move an application to exclude the public from the hearing of a case registered under the Official Secrets Act, but the passing of the sentence will, in any case, take place in public.

In his written order, Judge Zulqarnain barred print, electronic and social media from reporting the proceedings and evidence presented in the cipher case, and declared that its proceedings would be held in-camera.

Aleema says Imran’s sons may move UK court to ensure fair trial

After the hearing, Special Prosecutor Raja Rizwan Abbasi told journalists that the trial would be conducted in-camera from now on. He said that since the case was registered under sections 5 and 9 of the Official Secrets Act, the trial should be conducted behind closed doors.

He said the court had framed charges against the accused and the process of their indictment has been completed, even though they did not sign the charge sheet. The court would now start recording statements of witnesses, he said.

Similar orders have also been issued in the past on cases pertaining to national security, such as the Mumbai attacks case. However, in that matter, reporters were able to pose questions to lawyers after they emerged from the courtroom, who would share details about the day’s proceedings, which would then be reported by the press.

Incidentally, the Mumbai attacks case is also currently pending before the same judge.

But while Thursday’s order in the cipher case rest­rained the family members of the accused from sharing any details of the proceedings with the media, or on social, it did not mention whether lawyers would be able to share updates on proceedings or not.

Talking to reporters, Mr Qureshi’s counsel Barrister Taimur Malik said that the judge had read out the charges, but the court did not ask the accused to sign the charge sheet.

Mr Khan’s sister Aleema Khan told journalists that her nephews would file a lawsuit in UK courts as they believed the ex-PM has been denied a fair trial. Meanwhile, an accountability court in Islamabad handed over custody of Mr Khan to NAB in the Toshakhana case.

NAB’s prosecutor sought a seven-day physical remand but the judge granted only a two-day remand and adjourned the case until Saturday.

Published in Dawn, December 15th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Gaza genocide
Updated 06 Dec, 2024

Gaza genocide

Unless Western states cease their unflinching support to Israel, the genocide is unlikely to end.
Agri tax changes
06 Dec, 2024

Agri tax changes

IT is quite surprising if not disconcerting to see the PPP government in Sindh dragging its feet on the changes to...
AJK unrest
06 Dec, 2024

AJK unrest

THERE is trouble brewing in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, where a coalition comprising various civil society organisations...
Failed martial law
Updated 05 Dec, 2024

Failed martial law

Appetite for non-democratic systems of governance appears to be shrinking rapidly. Perhaps more countries are now realising the futility of rule by force.
Holding the key
05 Dec, 2024

Holding the key

IN the view of one learned judge of the Supreme Court’s recently formed constitutional bench, parliament holds the...
New low
05 Dec, 2024

New low

WHERE does one go from here? In the latest blow to women’s rights in Afghanistan, the Taliban regime has barred...