ISLAMABAD: President Dr Arif Alvi used his discretion to appoint the Press Council of Pakistan (PCP) chairman, rejecting the advice of the then-prime minister. The stance was taken by the Presidency in response to a petition filed before the Islamabad High Court (IHC) by one of the aspirants for the position that had been vacant since July 2019.

The petitioner, Arshad Khan Jadoon, had challenged President Alvi’s “biased discretion” to reject the summary and PM’s advice and discard the entire selection exercise “on a mere whim”. Accor­ding to the Presidency, President Alvi had received PM’s advice for Mr Jadoon’s appointment as PCP chairman, despite the fact that the law makes it clear that president is the appointing authority.

The Presidency, in its reply submitted to the IHC, referred to Section 6 (1) of the PCP Ordinance 2002, that provides, “The Council shall consist of 19 members including the Chairman. The Chairman shall be appointed by the President of Pakistan in his person qualified to be judge of the Supreme Court.”

It said this legal provision “explicitly states that the chairman shall be appointed by the president in his discretion and not on the advice of the prime minister.” It said the president conducted interviews of three candidates including petitioner Jad­oon on Aug 8 and appointed Dr G.M. Chaudhry as PCP chairman finding him as the “most suitable candidate and the decision was conveyed to the prime minister.”

Former PCP chairman Salahuddin Mengal had completed his three-year tenure in July 2019. The process to appoint another chairman was initiated by the PTI government, but remained inconclusive. The PDM government then finalised names for and pay scale of the slot of PCP chairman. The then information minister Marriyum Aurangzeb approved a summary on Nov 1, 2022, and forwarded the names of three shortlisted candidates, along with the selection board’s assessment, to the PM Office.

The three shortlisted candidates were Mr Jadoon, Mohammad Akram Khaksar and Dr G.M. Chaudhry, all of them lawyers. According to the board’s assessment, 295 marks were awarded to Mr Jadoon, 278 to Mr Khaksar and 267 to Dr Chaudhry. After the president rejected the summary and board’s assessment, Mr Jadoon filed the petition through his counsel, arguing that he had served as chairman of the Implementation Tribunal of Newspapers Employees for two years and as deputy attorney general in 2015.

It informed the IHC that former PM Shehbaz Sharif had approved his name and forwarded it to President Alvi.

“It is a principle of law that an appointing authority does not have unfettered, unbridled, unregulated and biased discretion and in this particular case, the President ignored the advice of the PM, and discarded the entire selection exercise on a mere whim,” Mr Jadoon argued.

Published in Dawn, October 21st, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Collective wisdom
05 Mar, 2026

Collective wisdom

IN times like these, when war is raging in the neighbourhood, it is important for the state to bring on board all...
Economic impact
Updated 05 Mar, 2026

Economic impact

The Iran-linked instability highlights the fact that Pakistan’s macroeconomic resilience remains fragile.
Shrouds of innocence
05 Mar, 2026

Shrouds of innocence

TWO-and-a-half years of relentless slaughtering of Palestinian children, with complete impunity and in the most...
Regional climbdown
04 Mar, 2026

Regional climbdown

WITH the region in flames, Pakistan must calibrate its foreign policy accordingly; it has to deal with some ...
Burning questions
Updated 04 Mar, 2026

Burning questions

A credible, independent, and time-bound inquiry is now necessary after the US Consulate protest ended in gruesome bloodshed.
Governance failure
04 Mar, 2026

Governance failure

BENEATH Lahore’s signal-free corridors and road infrastructure lies a darker truth: crumbling sewerage lines,...