IF only we, as a nation, had adopted Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah’s legacy, the country would not have been where it happens to be currently. We would never have suffered the humiliation of surrender in 1971, nor would we have ventured and got involved in proxy wars and become hostage to extremism and terrorism. The economy would not have been in tatters.

Jinnah wanted a modern democratic welfare state, where the Muslims could live in peace and harmony with members of other faiths or creeds, all enjoying equal rights as citizens of a sovereign state.

In Jinnah’s Pakistan there was no space for dictatorship, nor any concept of extremism, nor any role for the clergy, or paid public office holders, to decide the affairs of the state. What happened in Jaranwala recently could never have occurred if we had adopted his vision of a vibrant modern democratic welfare state, which would have invested in human resource development, with no tolerance for extremism. The kind of extremists who were involved in Jaranwala vandalism would never have existed in the first instance, and, if they did, the state would have dealt with them with an iron hand. We must never forget that Jinnah’s choice of Pakistan’s first law minister was Jogendra Nath Mandal, a Hindu Dalit leader.

Jinnah’s Pakistan would never have forfeited state sovereignty by giving the Badaber airbase from where American reconnaissance flights were to fly over Soviet airspace, nor would this country have got involved in superpower rivalry duringthe Cold War days. Pakistan would not have got involved in Afghan proxy wars and given sanctuary to foreign militants and mercenaries. In Jinnah’s Pakistan there would have been no dictator, and, hence, no ‘manufactured’ political midget.

Pakistan would have functioned as a modern state, investing in education, health and provision of basic necessities of life to its citizens. People would have been living in peace, free from the scourge of terrorism that it faces today.

On Jan 24, 1945, in an interview to London-based News Chronicle, Jinnah stated that the demand for Pakistan was “not a territorial demand, but a Muslim national demand”, and that the “Hindu society is so caste-ridden

that democracy is completely foreign and opposed to their basic and fundamental principles and structure of their society”.

Modi’s India has proven that Jinnah’s apprehension was based on solid grounds.

Malik Tariq Ali
Lahore

Published in Dawn, September 14th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Iran stalemate
Updated 02 May, 2026

Iran stalemate

THE US and Iran are currently somewhere between war and peace. While a tenuous ceasefire — extended largely due to...
Tax shortfall
02 May, 2026

Tax shortfall

THE Rs684bn shortfall in tax collection during the first 10 months of the fiscal year is a continuation of a...
Teaching inclusion
02 May, 2026

Teaching inclusion

DISCRIMINATORY and exclusionary content in Punjab’s textbooks has been flagged in Inclusive Education for a United...
Water vision
01 May, 2026

Water vision

WATER insecurity in Pakistan has been building up for decades as per capita water availability has declined from...
Vaccine policy
01 May, 2026

Vaccine policy

PAKISTAN has finally approved its first National Vaccine Policy; a step the health ministry has rightly described as...
Labour rights
Updated 01 May, 2026

Labour rights

THE annual observance of May Day should move beyond statements about the state’s commitment to the rights of...