A VIEW of a grain terminal at a sea port damaged during a Russian missile strike in Odesa.—Reuters
A VIEW of a grain terminal at a sea port damaged during a Russian missile strike in Odesa.—Reuters

MOSCOW: Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday that Moscow would “consider” returning to the Ukraine grain deal if its demands were “fully” met, saying the agreement had “lost all meaning.”

It was the first time the Russian leader commented since Moscow this week exited the landmark deal, which allowed the safe passage of cargo ships from Black Sea ports.

“The continuation of the grain deal in its current form has lost all meaning,” Putin said at a government meeting.

“Of course we will consider the possibility of returning to it — but only under one condition: if all principles under which Russia agreed to participate in the deal are fully taken into account and fulfilled.” He named the “withdrawal of sanctions on supplies of Russian grain and fertilisers to world markets” as one of the main conditions.

Kyiv alleges 60,000 tonnes of grain destroyed in Odesa attack

Moscow had for months complained that a related agreement on allowing the export of Russian food and fertilisers had not been honoured.

Putin said Russia had shown “miracles of poise and tolerance” by extending the deal several times.

But he accused Western countries of using the deal for “political blackmail”.

“Instead of helping countries in real need, the West used the grain deal for political blackmail and... turned it into a tool to enrich transnational corporations and speculators in the global grain market,” he said.

Putin spoke shortly after the Russian army said that cargo ships heading for Ukrainian ports on the Black Sea would be regarded as possibly carrying military cargo.

Odesa attack

Kyiv on Wednesday said Russia had destroyed 60,000 tonnes of grain meant for export in overnight strikes around the port of Odesa after accusing Moscow of purposefully hitting grain terminals.

Germany and France condemned Russian strikes, saying they were deliberately targeting grain and would affect the world’s poorest people.

Russia has fired missiles at Ukraine’s southern Odesa region for two nights in a row, hitting ports on the Black Sea.

Ukraine’s agriculture ministry said “60,000 tonnes of grain were also destroyed” in the port of Chornomorsk, outside Odesa.

It said the grain was meant to be “sent through the grain corridor 60 days ago.” “The grain infrastructure of international and Ukrainian traders and carriers such as (Ukrainian) Kernel, (Canadian) Viterra and the (French) CMA CGM Group suffered the most,” the ministry said.

“The world’s food security is once again in danger,” it added.

President Volodymyr Zelensky said earlier that Russia is “deliberately targeting the grain deal infrastructure.”

On Monday, Russia refused to extend the UN-brokered grain deal that allowed for critical grain shipments.

Since exiting the deal, Moscow has warned of “risks” over the future of grain exports via the Black Sea.

Published in Dawn, July 20th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...