Revisiting land use

Published May 7, 2023

ONE major factor contributing to urban decay and mismanagement of Pakistan’s cities is the fact that multiple landowners stand as a hurdle in the way of central planning of metropolitan areas. This is definitely the case in Karachi, Pakistan’s biggest metropolis, but other cities also suffer from the same problem. A plethora of agencies — federal, provincial, autonomous bodies etc — control parcels of land, creating a jigsaw puzzle of jurisdictions. Former mayor of Karachi Waseem Akhtar had at one time complained that his options of city management were limited because 15 different agencies controlled land in the city. Though there are different figures regarding the exact number of land-controlling agencies, independent experts back this claim, mentioning cantonments, the KPT, Railways and others as owners of land in Karachi, besides the city administration. Perhaps one solution has emerged from across the eastern border that can help improve the management of urban land in Pakistan. According to media reports, Indian authorities have decided to do away with most cantonments. These will be rebranded as ‘military stations’, while civilian areas of cantonments will be handed over to municipal authorities. It should be mentioned that our Supreme Court had ruled in 2007 that civilian areas should be excluded from cantonment boards, but the court’s order has not been implemented.

Cantonments are a vestige of the country’s colonial past, and in most instances include civilian areas that have nothing to do with military activities. While these areas may have been separate from the civilian parts of cities during the British era, the rapid, unplanned growth of our urban areas has resulted in many cantonments merging with the urban sprawl. For the health and growth of our cities, land management and planning should be under elected mayors, with input from subdivisions such as towns and union councils. This would be in keeping with the constitutional vision of local government — a vision many of our political parties have tried their best to thwart. Moreover, it would be better from a security point of view if exclusively military facilities were located outside urban areas. Giving control of cities to elected mayors would help solve many financial and planning issues our urban areas face. A first step can be taken by giving areas falling under the jurisdiction of cantonment boards that have no ostensible military utility back to the civilian administration.

Published in Dawn, May 7th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Wheat price crash
Updated 20 May, 2024

Wheat price crash

What the government has done to Punjab’s smallholder wheat growers by staying out of the market amid crashing prices is deplorable.
Afghan corruption
20 May, 2024

Afghan corruption

AMONGST the reasons that the Afghan Taliban marched into Kabul in August 2021 without any resistance to speak of ...
Volleyball triumph
20 May, 2024

Volleyball triumph

IN the last week, while Pakistan’s cricket team savoured a come-from-behind T20 series victory against Ireland,...
Border clashes
19 May, 2024

Border clashes

THE Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier has witnessed another series of flare-ups, this time in the Kurram tribal district...
Penalising the dutiful
19 May, 2024

Penalising the dutiful

DOES the government feel no remorse in burdening honest citizens with the cost of its own ineptitude? With the ...
Students in Kyrgyzstan
Updated 19 May, 2024

Students in Kyrgyzstan

The govt ought to take a direct approach comprising convincing communication with the students and Kyrgyz authorities.