Interest-free economy

Published December 11, 2022

RECENT debate by a Senate panel on the government’s plan — if we can call it one — to implement a riba-free banking and financial system in the next five years has brought to the fore serious challenges that will have to be overcome before the Federal Shariat Court’s order can be executed. The finance ministry and the State Bank appear clueless as to how the transformation is to be effected and what implications there would be for the country’s economy and its financial dealings with the rest of the world. This reinforces the perception that, rather than being based on logical reasoning, the decision to withdraw legal challenges to the FSC verdict was meant to appease and win over right-wing elements. PPP Senator Saleem Mandviwalla’s disclosure that some foreign banks, including the Bank of China, had informed him that it would not be easy for them to function in Pakistan if interest-free banking were to be implemented underlines the risks the transformation plan poses to the economy. The SBP itself has admitted that the path towards interest-free banking is beset with hurdles related to public and external debt, monetary policy, etc.

Defining riba in this age of a complex and globally connected financial system is not as straightforward as some clerics would have us believe. Nor is it easy to have 100pc interest-free banking within five years as indicated by State Minister for Finance Ayesha Ghaus Pasha during the Senate hearing. Even if the existing Islamic banking system is accepted as ‘Sharia-compliant’, it may be riba-free but not necessarily interest-free as pointed out by a panel member. Therefore, the government must heed the panel’s advice to cautiously tread this path to avoid disrupting efforts to integrate Pakistan with the global financial system and attract foreign financial institutions and investors. The FSC should also review its decision, and allow the government and SBP to make a decision based on extensive research and according to the realities of the present global financial system.

Published in Dawn, December 11th, 2022

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...