Gilot and Picasso in 1950, with their children Claude and Paloma
Gilot and Picasso in 1950, with their children Claude and Paloma

Among Picasso’s partners were two formidable female artists: Dora Maar (1907–97) and Françoise Gilot (1921-). For a long time, these women were known primarily as his muse or lover, but further scrutiny of their extensive careers reveals that they were also his collaborators and innovative artists in their own right.

Both women profoundly influenced Picasso, and both were exceptional talents. ‘The Picasso Century’, currently at the National Gallery of Victoria, offers a rare opportunity to see their work in Australia.

Charismatic and unconventional Dora Maar

In Dora Maar With and Without Picasso: A Biography (2000), Mary Ann Caws writes that Picasso first saw Dora Maar in Cafe les Deux Magots. Sitting alone, she was using a penknife to stab the tabletop between her gloved fingers, staining the white flowers of her gloves with blood. The pair were later introduced when Maar worked as the set photographer on Jean Renoir’s The Crime of Monsieur Lange (1936). They soon began a relationship.

By all accounts, Maar was intelligent, charismatic and unconventional. When she met Picasso she had a successful and established career as a photographer. Surrealists had been dismissive of photography until Maar demonstrated its potential, creating some of the movement’s most powerful and important works.

Dora Maar and Françoise Gilot were much more than Picasso’s muses or lovers. They are important artists in their own right

According to NGV’s Meg Slater, Maar’s centrality to Surrealism arose through experimentation in her commercial photography, as well as her commitment to radical left-wing politics. She was remarkable for a woman at that time.

Maar has been identified with the nine Weeping Women canvasses which depict how Picasso saw her, profoundly impacted by Guernica’s bombing during the Spanish Civil War.

But these portraits have reductively characterised her as a volatile and emotional woman. Maar says, “all [of Picasso’s] portraits of me are lies”.

Maar often photographed Picasso during their relationship, most notably in creating his 1937 anti-war work Guernica. She was represented within the painting as a figure holding a light.

Renowned for moving from one lover to another, Picasso left Maar for Françoise Gilot — notoriously the only woman to leave him.

Critically reflective Françoise Gilot

Untitled (1934), Dora Maar
Untitled (1934), Dora Maar

Gilot had an extraordinary life. Before 25, she had lived through the Nazi occupation of Paris, studied dance under Isadora Duncan’s protégée and taken “morning walks with Gertrude Stein.”

She achieved expertise in ceramics well before she met Picasso. It was during their almost 10-year relationship that he took an interest in ceramics, eventually producing 3,500 works.

Gilot was physically and psychologically abused by Picasso and lived with very little autonomy throughout their relationship. Many of her works testify to this.

The Earthenware (1951) shows a window with bars. Paloma asleep in her crib (1950) depicts windows without views. Adam forcing Eve to Eat an Apple (1946) is an image of coercion with a disturbing likeness to Picasso and Gilot.

In 1953 she left with their children, Claude and Paloma. Outraged, Picasso began to sabotage her artistic career. In 1964 she published a memoir, Life with Picasso, following his three legal challenges to stop it. She is unusual for writing critically reflective pieces on her own work, situating her as well ahead of her time.

Maar and Gilot were creative collaborators, not just muses of Picasso. Before and after him, their artistic achievements — and exceptional volumes of creative work — locate them as important artists.

Across their long careers, their output straddled a variety of media and styles, each with her own female gaze.

‘The Picasso Century’ was displayed at the National Gallery of Victoria, Australia until October 9

The writer is Professor and Dean, School of Media and Communication at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia

Republished from The Conversation

Published in Dawn, EOS, October 16th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.