BRUSSELS: The EU’s top court said on Monday that officials can detain migrant rescue ships, but only if they can prove there is a real risk to health, safety or the environment, in mixed guidance on a case testing Europe’s response to refugees.

German campaign group Sea Watch launched a legal challenge after Sicilian port authorities detained two of its vessels that had rescued migrants in the Mediterranean and taken them to Sicily in 2020.

Italian judges hearing the complaint asked the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for guidance on the case that goes to the heart of disputes over how to respond to the tens of thousands of people risking the crossing from Africa every year.

Sea Watch, which patrols the Mediterranean to pick up migrants in distress — a practice which some European states say encourages migration — is arguing that the port authorities exceeded their authority by detaining the vessels.

The Sicilian ports of Palermo and Empedocle argued at the time that they had searched and detained the vessels on the grounds that they were overcrowded and not registered for search and rescue operations, according to the ECJ. The Luxembourg-based EU court delivered a mixed ruling which could support arguments on both sides of the case.

It said port authorities have the right to check and detain ships under certain circumstances, though the mere fact that a vessel is carrying people rescued at the sea does not offer sufficient grounds for that.

“The number of persons on board, even if greater than that which is authorised, cannot therefore, in itself, constitute a ground for a control,” the court said in a statement.

It also suggested, however, that regularly running search and rescue operations using ships certified for cargo - as was the case for the Sea Watch vessels - could provide sufficient grounds for port authority controls. Sea Watch welcomed the ruling, saying it provided legal security for NGOs and “a victory for sea rescue”.

“The fact that port state controls can continue to take place on NGO ships is a good thing,” it said. “They are intended to ensure ship safety, which is important to us. Arbitrary controls, on the other hand, must finally come to an end.” There was no immediate reaction from the Sicilian port authorities.

The ECJ ruling sets out the current state of European law on the issue. But it will be up to the Sicilian court to rule if the specific circumstances in these cases justified the actions by the port authorities.

Around 61,000 people have completed the crossing this year and an estimated 938 have died on the route, according to data from the UN refugee agency UNHCR.

Published in Dawn, August 2nd, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Hasty transition
Updated 05 May, 2024

Hasty transition

Ostensibly, the aim is to exert greater control over social media and to gain more power to crack down on activists, dissidents and journalists.
One small step…
05 May, 2024

One small step…

THERE is some good news for the nation from the heavens above. On Friday, Pakistan managed to dispatch a lunar...
Not out of the woods
05 May, 2024

Not out of the woods

PAKISTAN’S economic vitals might be showing some signs of improvement, but the country is not yet out of danger....
Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...