US judge mulls delay of former Trump aide Bannon’s trial

Published July 20, 2022
Former Trump White House chief strategist Steve Bannon departs after the opening day of his trial on contempt of Congress charges. — Reuters
Former Trump White House chief strategist Steve Bannon departs after the opening day of his trial on contempt of Congress charges. — Reuters

WASHINGTON: A federal judge said on Tuesday he will consider delaying the criminal trial of Steve Bannon, a prominent former presidential adviser to Donald Trump, due to a dispute over the scope of the defence to be presented for why Bannon defied a subpoena from lawmakers investigating last year’s attack on the US Capitol.

Bannon, 68, is facing two misdemeanor counts of obstruction of Congress after he declined last year to provide testimony or documents to the Democratic-led House of Representatives select committee.

The court had been expe­cted to finalise selecting 12 jurors and two alternates from a pool of 22 people on Tuesday, with opening statements from the prosecution and defense following. That process was delayed as US District Judge Carl Nichols dealt with a dispute between the two sides over what evidence can be presented by the defense in the case.

The judge denied a motion by Bannon’s lawyers to delay the start of the trial by a month, but said he would entertain the possibility of a shorter delay — perhaps a couple of days — and ordered the parties to hash out the issues over a lunch break.

Nichols had previously ruled that Bannon could not claim he failed to comply with the subpoena because he believed his documents and testimony were protected by a legal doctrine called executive privilege that can keep certain presidential communications confidential.

The judge also previously barred Bannon from telling jurors that he relied upon advice from his lawyer, who told him there were valid legal reasons he could fail to respond to the subpoena.

Nichols left open the door last week for Bannon to offer a defense that he believed the subpoena deadlines were flexible and subject to negotiation. Bannon reversed course this month and said he wanted to testify before a public committee hearing, nearly 10 months after defying the subpoena.

There has been no indication of any plan to have him do so, as the committee likely would want him to first testify in closed sessions in order to cover a wide range of matters. Trump told Bannon he was waiving any executive privilege claim.

Published in Dawn, July 20th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...
Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...