US judge mulls delay of former Trump aide Bannon’s trial

Published
1
Former Trump White House chief strategist Steve Bannon departs after the opening day of his trial on contempt of Congress charges. — Reuters
Former Trump White House chief strategist Steve Bannon departs after the opening day of his trial on contempt of Congress charges. — Reuters

WASHINGTON: A federal judge said on Tuesday he will consider delaying the criminal trial of Steve Bannon, a prominent former presidential adviser to Donald Trump, due to a dispute over the scope of the defence to be presented for why Bannon defied a subpoena from lawmakers investigating last year’s attack on the US Capitol.

Bannon, 68, is facing two misdemeanor counts of obstruction of Congress after he declined last year to provide testimony or documents to the Democratic-led House of Representatives select committee.

The court had been expe­cted to finalise selecting 12 jurors and two alternates from a pool of 22 people on Tuesday, with opening statements from the prosecution and defense following. That process was delayed as US District Judge Carl Nichols dealt with a dispute between the two sides over what evidence can be presented by the defense in the case.

The judge denied a motion by Bannon’s lawyers to delay the start of the trial by a month, but said he would entertain the possibility of a shorter delay — perhaps a couple of days — and ordered the parties to hash out the issues over a lunch break.

Nichols had previously ruled that Bannon could not claim he failed to comply with the subpoena because he believed his documents and testimony were protected by a legal doctrine called executive privilege that can keep certain presidential communications confidential.

The judge also previously barred Bannon from telling jurors that he relied upon advice from his lawyer, who told him there were valid legal reasons he could fail to respond to the subpoena.

Nichols left open the door last week for Bannon to offer a defense that he believed the subpoena deadlines were flexible and subject to negotiation. Bannon reversed course this month and said he wanted to testify before a public committee hearing, nearly 10 months after defying the subpoena.

There has been no indication of any plan to have him do so, as the committee likely would want him to first testify in closed sessions in order to cover a wide range of matters. Trump told Bannon he was waiving any executive privilege claim.

Published in Dawn, July 20th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...