Court refers social media rules to NA speaker for review

Published
1

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Wednesday referred the social media rules to the National Assembly speaker for review and to make necessary amendments to ensure freedom of expression.

IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah resumed hearing on the identical petitions filed against the social media rules introduced by the previous Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) government. The rules, introduced through the Removal and Blocking of Unlawful Online Content Rules 2020 under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016, were immediately rejected by many stakeholders such as the Internet Service Providers of Pakistan (ISPAK) and were widely criticised as being ‘draconian’.

Leader of Pakistan Peoples Party Farhatullah Babar, through his counsel Usama Khawar, filed a miscellaneous application before the court on Wednesday.

It stated that the petitioners as well as citizens were entitled to protection of law and enforcement of their fundamental rights related to freedom of expression and fair trial.

“As the principles of democracy are not based on dogmas, they do not accept the theory of absolutes in any sphere of polity and political life, therefore, the authors of the Constitution, by enumerating fundamental rights, apparently did so in the belief that the proper and rational synthesis of the provisions would lead to the establishment of an open and democratic society under the rule of law,” the application said.

The impugned rules are utterly violative of the fundamental rights and requested the court to set aside these rules.

Justice Minallah remarked that since the petitioner belonged to a political party which is part of the coalition government, therefore, it would be appropriate if the government would invite stakeholders and amend these rules after proper consultation. He advised that the rules should be clear and there should be no room left for their misuse to curtail the freedom of expression. Mr Babar also conceded that the matter might be referred to the parliament.

Justice Minallah observed that there were certain issues which should be kept in mind, for examples challenges related to hate speech and other related crimes. He, however, remarked that it would be a test case for the incumbent government as well.

Published in Dawn, May 12th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

The jurisdiction of the two courts and a mechanism for settling disputes between them should be spelt out in law, not left to judges to fight over.
Growing crisis
15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

AN emergency can be judged by the speed with which it draws an effective response. The National Population Council’s...
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...