LAHORE: A Lahore High Court full bench formed to decide several petitions pending since long against former prime minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and former presidents retired Gen Pervez Musharraf and Asif Ali Zardari, dissolved on Monday following recusal by one of its members.

The bench comprising Chief Justice Muhammad Ameer Bhatti, Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan and Justice Shujaat Ali Khan assembled to hear the petitions. However, Justice Khan recused himself from hearing the cases for “personal reasons”.

The CJ observed although the petitions became infructuous due to the death of the petitioners, a new full bench would be constituted to formally dispose of the pleas.

Advocate Rana Ilamuddin Ghazi had filed the petitions against Musharraf and Zardari, while Advocate Shahid Naseem Gondal and Advocate Allah Bakhsh Gondal against Gilani.

These petitions filed from 2010 to 2012 were last heard by the LHC in 2017. However, all three petitioners passed away during the pendency of their petitions. Senior lawyer AK Dogar, who was the counsel for Advocate Ghazi, in one of the petition, also passed away last year.

The petition against Gen Musharraf had sought treason proceedings against him for imposing emergency rule in the country. In another plea, the court was asked to disqualify Zardari for holding political office of the PPP while being president of the country. Against Mr Gilani, the petitioners said, he continued to hold the PM office despite his conviction under contempt of court charge by the SC.

Published in Dawn, September 21st, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Updated 20 May, 2022

TTP peace talks

ANOTHER attempt to sue for peace with the outlawed TTP is being made, again facilitated by the Afghan Taliban that...
20 May, 2022

Beyond the law

THE senior judiciary should take care not to overreach in its zeal to ‘fix’ issues it ideally need not worry...
20 May, 2022

Political musical chairs

YET another political crisis is brewing in Balochistan, where old rivals Jam Kamal Khan Alyani and Sardar Yar...
Updated 19 May, 2022

To be or not to be

The same decision taken weeks or months from now will have far more devastating consequences.
19 May, 2022

Impact on Punjab

THE Supreme Court judgement interpreting the issue of disqualification of parliamentarians under Article 63A of the...
19 May, 2022

Forest fires

THOUGH spot and forest fires have become a perennial phenomenon especially in peak summer, the recent blazes —...