Sindh lawyers boycott courts over ad hoc judge controversy

Published August 11, 2021
In this file photo, a man walks past a locked City court room during a lawyers' strike. — AFP/File
In this file photo, a man walks past a locked City court room during a lawyers' strike. — AFP/File

KARACHI: Lawyers boycotted legal proceedings in the superior and subordinate judiciary in the metropolis as well as Hyderabad on Tuesday in protest against the proposed appointment of Sindh High Court’s Chief Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh as an ad hoc judge of the Supreme Court.

The lawyers’ leaders closed the entrances to the Sindh High Court, City Courts and Malir District Courts to dissuade their colleagues from appearing before the courts to plead their cases fixed for the day.

They also barred a large number of litigants from entering the courts’ premises, forcing them to return without attending the hearings of their cases.

Only the courts’ staffers were allowed access to the courtrooms.

At the SHC, lawyers holding placards chanted slogans against ignoring the seniority principle in elevation of high court judges to the Supreme Court and proposed ad hoc appointment of CJ Shaikh.

The absence of litigants and their counsel forced benches to discharge their boards and defer the cases fixed before them.

In the subordinate judiciary, the undertrial prisoners had to be taken back to the barracks without production before the courts.

The members of the Sindh High Court Bar Association, Karachi Bar Association and Malir District Bar Association gathered in the offices of the bar associations to discuss the issue of elevation of a junior judge of the high court to the apex court.

Speaking to the media, SHCBA president Salahuddin Ahmed reiterated the bar associations’ contention that the principle of seniority be followed in elevation and appointment of judges to the SC in letter and spirit.

He said at present there seemed to be no fixed criterion for the elevation of judges to the country’s top court, adding that the same should be evolved and all the stakeholders, particularly the bars across the country, as well as the principal law officers of the provincial and federal governments should also be taken on board in this regard.

Barrister Ahmed said that the procedure being currently adopted by the Judicial Commission of Pakistan for the elevation of the high courts’ judges to the SC would create distrust among judges of the superior judiciary about one another, besides tarnishing the image of the institution of the judiciary in the public and negatively impacting its functioning.

Published in Dawn, August 11th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...
Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...