PPP rejects appointment of Nilofar as NCSW chief

Published July 30, 2021
Nilofar Bakhtiar speaks during an interview with Reuters Television in 2007. — Reuters/File
Nilofar Bakhtiar speaks during an interview with Reuters Television in 2007. — Reuters/File

ISLAMABAD: The opposition Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) on Thursday rejected Nilofar Bakhtiar’s appointment as chairperson of the National Commission on the Status of Women (NCSW).

“Nilofar Bakhtiar’s appointment is tantamount to dacoity [robbery] and insult to parliament,” said PPP’s Nafisa Shah in a statement.

Referring to an in-camera meeting of the parliamentary committee on the appointment of the NCSW chairperson on June 15, the PPP’s MNA claimed that the other applicant, Fauzia Waqar, had got six votes, while Ms Bakhtiar had secured five votes during the election for the post.

Ms Shah argued how could the decision to hold elections under parliamentary traditions and rules be overturned?

“The so-called government is making a major commission on women controversial. The appointment against parliamentary traditions is an insult to Pakistani women. Such a commission is not acceptable at all,” she added.

The PPP leader asked the government to immediately withdraw the notification about the appointment of Ms Bakhtiar.

The news about the appointment of Ms Bakhtiar as the new NCSW chairperson was revealed by Human Rights Minister Dr Shireen Mazari during a meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Human Rights on Wednesday. When some committee members inquired from the minister about the new NCSW head, she said her office was not part of the election process.

“We are only issuing a notification of Nilofar Bakhtiar’s appointment,” she disclosed.

A controversy had arisen during the in-camera meeting of the parliamentary committee to appoint the chairperson of the NCSW on June 14.

After the meeting, the opposition members claimed that its nominee Fauzia Waqar had been chosen for the post lying vacant for the last two years but alleged that the ruling PTI member, who chaired the meeting, “ran away” without declaring the result.

According to the opposition members, Ms Waqar polled six votes against five bagged by PTI’s candidate Nilofar Bakhtiar during the meeting.

The controversy arose when Falak Naz, who presided over the meeting, said she was using her casting vote and now the votes had become equal.

Nafisa Shah had stated at that time that the opposition members had already written to National Assembly Speaker Asad Qaiser to forward Ms Waqar’s name to the prime minister as per the law for her nomination. She said the committee comprised an equal number of members from the treasury and opposition.

“Under the rules, casting vote is used if votes originally polled are equal. Instead of declaring her victory, the chairperson of the committee left. This is a violation of the rules,” Ms Shah said, alleging that the members of the treasury benches were unaware of the rules.

Published in Dawn, July 30th, 2021

Opinion

Sub judice rule
18 Sep 2021

Sub judice rule

It is time this objection, sub judice, is laid to rest.
The Black Caps folly
Updated 18 Sep 2021

The Black Caps folly

There is so much wrong — and worrying — about the entire sorry episode of New Zealand backing out of Pakistan tour.
CT NAP revisited
Updated 18 Sep 2021

CT NAP revisited

A policy of appeasement towards extremists has undermined the state’s writ.
Pathways for reform
Updated 17 Sep 2021

Pathways for reform

Even now the government has said they are listening, but they have not said how they are listening.

Editorial

Blinken’s remarks
Updated 18 Sep 2021

Blinken’s remarks

The US establishment cannot scapegoat Pakistan for two decades of bad policy in Afghanistan.
18 Sep 2021

Worrying survey

THE findings of the Labour Force Survey 2018-19 indicate that some important headline trends have already taken or...
18 Sep 2021

Special needs

THE fact that only 3,653 children with special needs, out of some 300,000 in Sindh, are registered with the...
TTP amnesty?
Updated 17 Sep 2021

TTP amnesty?

An amnesty should be for some individuals, not the entire outfit.
17 Sep 2021

Media regulation

THE needless controversy over media regulation may finally be heading for a resolution. In a meeting with ...
17 Sep 2021

Refusing audit

THE continuous resistance put up by several public-sector organisations to submitting their accounts for audit by ...