Director defends Australia gun massacre film at Cannes

Published July 17, 2021
Director Justin Kurzel, cast member Caleb Landry Jones, writer Shaun Grant and producer Nick Batzias pose for a photograph on Friday.—Reuters
Director Justin Kurzel, cast member Caleb Landry Jones, writer Shaun Grant and producer Nick Batzias pose for a photograph on Friday.—Reuters

CANNES: The director of a controversial movie about the man who carried out Australia’s worst mass shooting defended his movie on Friday and warned that the lessons of the Port Arthur massacre are being forgotten.

Martin Bryant killed 35 people and wounded 23 others in a rampage at a tourist spot in Tasmania in 1996 that so scarred the country that its guns laws were rewritten within days.

“Nitram” — Bryant’s first name backwards — is one of the most hotly-debated films in the running for the top prize at the Cannes film festival.

The gunman is played by American actor Caleb Landry Jones, who looks shockingly like the killer. But director Justin Kurzel told AFP at Cannes that firearms rules have been relaxed so much since that “there are now more guns in Australia than before Port Arthur”.

Despite 650,000 weapons being taken out of circulation by a gun amnesty after the massacre, the maker of “Assassin’s Creed” and “Snowtown” said history could repeat itself.

Kurzel has faced severe criticism at home for making the movie, with fellow director Richard Keddie saying “art does not justify a Martin Bryant movie...

and it is entirely irresponsible.” Others claimed it could not but be exploitative and would retraumatise both survivors and families of the dead.

Published in Dawn, July 17th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

A breakthrough?
07 May, 2026

A breakthrough?

The whole world would welcome an end to this pointless war.
Missed opportunity
07 May, 2026

Missed opportunity

A BIG opportunity to industrialise Pakistan has just passed us by. This has been reconfirmed by the investment...
Punishing dissent
07 May, 2026

Punishing dissent

THE Sindh government’s treatment of the Aurat March this week was a disgraceful assault on democratic rights. What...
The May war
Updated 06 May, 2026

The May war

Rationality demands that both states come to the table and discuss their grievances, and their solutions in a mature manner.
Looking inwards
06 May, 2026

Looking inwards

REGULAR appraisals by human rights groups and activists should not be treated by the authorities as attempts to ...
Feeling the heat
06 May, 2026

Feeling the heat

ANOTHER heatwave season has begun, and once again, the state is scrambling to respond to conditions it has long been...