Another’s eyes

Published June 24, 2021
The writer is an author.
The writer is an author.

WHEN our leaders are being manufactured without any quality control, it helps to examine them through another’s eyes, rather than the mirror of self-adulation.

In 1958, the governor general, Ghulam Mohammad, attempted to hand over authority to Gen Ayub Khan. He “commanded him to produce a Constitution within three months”. “You wicked old man,” Ayub Khan muttered to himself.

When Ayub Khan did take over, British high commissioner Morrice James wrote: “Ayub and his British-oriented colleagues were relics of a departed order of things: some of them were military officers who had been trained at Sandhurst and in the old Indian Army.”

James’s opinion of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was more trenchant. Bhutto had “the rank odour of hellfire about him. It was a case of corruptio optime pessima [the corruption of the best is the worst of all]. He was a flawed angel … [lacking] a sense of dignity and value of other people; his own self was what counted”.

In 1971, Dr Henry Kissinger used president Yahya Khan as a bridge into communist Chi­na but saw him no more than a “bluff, direct soldier of limited imagination”. Premier Zhou Enlai thought Yahya Khan “probably a good man, a man of good intentions, but he didn’t know how to lead an army, how to fight”. Dr Kissinger was equally dismissive of US generals: “There are very many intelligent colonels and very few intelligent generals.”

Being PM involves more than facing fast balls.

Gen Ziaul Haq understandably got scant compliments from the Indians. The BJP leader L.K. Advani thought “there was something artificial in his cordiality”; the journalist Kuldip Nayar rued calling him a “ruthless dictator”; and a former India ambassador Natwar Singh recalled that Ziaul Haq “had power, but not personality. There was something misshapen about it [.] His lack of charisma was made up for by a stunning display of tahzeeb, tahammul and sharafat (politeness, patience and civility). Like Chou En-lai, he was a master at public relations”.

His fellow general Pervez Musharraf had no time for Nawaz Sharif nor his brother Sheh­­baz, who, he observed, in their late father’s presence “behaved more like courtiers than sons”. Now that both he and Nawaz Sharif are ‘incarcerated’ in Dubai and in London, perhaps Musharraf might like to revisit his words: “Exile and isolation are an opportunity for introspection and critical self-analysis. Nawaz Sharif apparently learned nothing from his exile and failed to grow intellectually or politically.”

Another former prime minister and Lon­don resident at Her Majesty’s pleasure — Shau­kat Aziz — might prefer not to be remi­nded when, as prime minister, he “tried this Saville Row-suited gigolo kind of charm” on US secretary of state Condoleeza Rice. She “stared him down. By the end of the meeting, he was babbling”.

The US saw and sees Pakistan quite differently, less long-term. Condoleeza Rice’s summation of US-Pak relations could have been written for today: “Pakistan is like a critically ill patient. You know, you get up every day, you take the pulse, you deal with whatever fever has set in overnight and you just try to keep it alive for the next day.”

Another playboy-turned-prime minister published his memoirs as a prelude to assuming office. It contains unvarnished sketches of today’s leadership. Of Asif Ali Zardari, he wrote that he became president through the words of a testamentary will “that no one has been able to authenticate”. He castigated Zardari for importuning the Americans to give him “economic resources so that I can win over the people, so that there is something in it for them”.

Imran Khan’s choicest contempt is reser­ved for his immediate, elusive predecessor Nawaz Sharif. In clinical notes of which Dr Freud would have been proud, PM Khan analysed that Nawaz’s “real dream was to have been the captain of the Pak­i­­­­stan cricket team”. And in a hilarious dismissal of Nawaz Sha­r­if’s cricketing pretensions, he described how Nawaz Sharif volunteered to be the opening batsman against the West Indies fast bowlers, facing them with nothing more than “his batting pads, a floppy hat — and a smile”. Mercifully, Nawaz Sharif was bowled out on the second ball.

Being prime minister, as Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Nawaz Sharif and now Imran Khan have discovered, involves more than facing fast balls, googlies, bouncers, and bruisers. When Zulfi­kar Ali Bhutto refused to roll back our nuc­lear programme, Dr Kissinger threatened to make “a horrible example” of Pakistan. When Nawaz Sharif detonated the first nuclear explosion at Chagai in 1998, he braved US sanctions. Refusal to allow US monitoring windows could invoke similar retaliation.

One wonders whether Imran Khan had foreseen such a spectre when, as he says, he day-dreamed that one day the Pakistan Test Team would discover that they were a player short, and that he would put up his hand, be selected “and be brought on to suddenly become a hero”.

The writer is an author.

www.fsaijazuddin.pk

Published in Dawn, June 24th, 2021

Opinion

Who benefits more?
Updated 03 Aug 2021

Who benefits more?

It’s been widely assumed that China was always going to secure the most benefits.
Back to the future
Updated 02 Aug 2021

Back to the future

A civil war next door would pose serious threats to Pakistan’s security and multidimensional challenges.

Editorial

03 Aug 2021

Changing GB’s status

THE government’s plans to accord a provisional provincial status to Gilgit-Baltistan are progressing steadily and...
Taliban assault
03 Aug 2021

Taliban assault

Intra-Afghan peace talks should be promoted, but the global community must be ready for the imminent collapse of the Afghan state.
03 Aug 2021

Cancelling Aurat March

THE cancellation of Aurat March Faisalabad is exactly one of those ‘isolated incidents’ which, when viewed...
02 Aug 2021

Row over NCSW

SOME matters are simply too important to play politics on. Protection of women’s rights is one of them....
02 Aug 2021

Mismanaging LNG

PAKISTAN’S purchase of expensive LNG cargoes for the September-October delivery in less than three weeks after...
Against their will
Updated 02 Aug 2021

Against their will

Estimates indicate that some 1,000 girls from minority communities are forcibly converted to Islam every year in Pakistan.