Iran nuclear talks termed positive despite enrichment, sabotage

Published April 16, 2021
Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia's ambassador to the IAEA arrives at the Grand Hotel Wien where closed-door nuclear talks with Iran take place, in Vienna on April 15. - AP
Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia's ambassador to the IAEA arrives at the Grand Hotel Wien where closed-door nuclear talks with Iran take place, in Vienna on April 15. - AP

VIENNA: Diplomats said on Thursday that the latest talks in Vienna to save the 2015 Iran nuclear deal were positive despite fresh tensions over Tehran’s announcement that it was preparing to ramp up uranium enrichment in response to an attack on a facility it blamed on arch-foe Israel.

The latest round of diplomatic negotiations aimed at ensuring the US’s return to the accord lasted for roughly two hours on Thursday afternoon, with Russia’s ambassador to the UN in Vienna, Mikhail Ulyanov, tweeting afterwards that the “general impression is positive”.

The talks comprised delegations from the remaining parties to the deal following the US exit — Germany, France, Britain, China, Russia and Iran.

There had been fears that developments in recent days could cast a pall over the talks, with a European diplomat telling this news agency ahead of the meeting that Iran’s announcement that it would enrich uranium up to 60 percent “puts pressure on everyone”.

The move would take Iran closer to the 90 percent purity level needed for use in a nuclear weapon.

Tehran says the enrichment move is a response to Israel’s “nuclear terrorism” after an explosion on Sunday knocked out power at its Natanz enrichment plant.

Israel has neither confirmed nor denied involvement, but public radio reports in the country said it was a sabotage operation by the Mossad spy agency, citing unnamed intelligence sources.

Despite the latest developments on the ground, the chair of the talks, EU diplomat Enrique Mora, also struck an upbeat note at the end of Thursday’s meeting.

He tweeted that participants had been “ready to advance... despite very challenging events and announcements over the past days”.

Another diplomatic source said there had been “no big problems” at the talks, which is now expected to be followed by fresh meetings of experts to discuss possible measures to be taken by Washington and Tehran on sanctions lifting and nuclear issues.

The head of the Iranian delegation, Abbas Araghchi, was more cautious at the end of Thursday’s meeting.

According to a statement from Iran’s foreign ministry, Araghchi stressed that Tehran wanted to avoid the talks “dragging on” and that they had to “take place in a well-defined framework and within an acceptable time period”.

He also stated that the planned rise in enrichment levels was in order to “meet some of the country’s medical needs”.

Brussels has rejected this argument, with EU external affairs spokesperson Peter Stano saying there was “no credible or plausible civilian justification” for the move.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that the announcement on uranium “calls into question Iran’s seriousness with regard to the nuclear talks”.

His Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif retorted on Twitter that “Iran’s ‘seriousness of purpose’ in pursuing diplomacy was tested in the three years since Trump withdrew from the nuclear accord”.

“Iran — by remaining in the deal — passed with flying colors,” he said, accusing US President Joe Biden of continuing the “maximum pressure” policy towards Iran followed by his predecessor Donald Trump.

Trump dramatically withdrew from the deal — known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — in 2018 and went on to re-impose sanctions against Iran, prompting Tehran to retaliate by exceeding the accord’s limits on its nuclear activity.

Published in Dawn, April 16th, 2021

Opinion

Global governance
27 Oct 2021

Global governance

Wise countries design growth strategies as per their socioeconomic needs.
Too hot to handle
Updated 27 Oct 2021

Too hot to handle

Will Glasgow offer anything more than ‘blah blah blah’?
What a tangled web
Updated 26 Oct 2021

What a tangled web

So poorly kept is this secret about the opposition’s real hopes and no plans that even the government has figured it out.

Editorial

27 Oct 2021

Escalating prices

ONE question being asked by almost every Pakistani today is: for how long will we have to suffer food price ...
Another demolition
Updated 27 Oct 2021

Another demolition

THE closing act in the battle over the 15-storey Nasla Tower in Karachi has been set in motion. On Monday, the...
27 Oct 2021

A despicable custom

IT is a wonder that it took so long for the Federal Shariat Court to declare the practice of swara un-Islamic. To...
Perfect in every way
Updated 26 Oct 2021

Perfect in every way

GLORIOUS. Gratifying. Liberating. Pakistan’s thumping victory over India in their opening fixture of the T20 World...
26 Oct 2021

Balochistan CM’s exit

ON Sunday, Jam Kamal Khan Alyani’s name was added to the long list of chief ministers of Balochistan who ...
Minister’s odd logic
26 Oct 2021

Minister’s odd logic

THE government’s contradictions and confusion appear to have no end when it comes to dealing with the Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan.