Sialkot DC, DPO made OSD ahead of ECP hearing

Published March 4, 2021
Sialkot deputy commissioner (DC) Zeeshan Javaid. — Photo courtesy Deputy Commissioner Sialkot Facebook
Sialkot deputy commissioner (DC) Zeeshan Javaid. — Photo courtesy Deputy Commissioner Sialkot Facebook

LAHORE: Sialkot deputy commissioner (DC) Zeeshan Javaid and district police officer (DPO) Hassan Asad Alvi were made officers on special duty (OSD) on Wednesday in the wake of the Daska by-election ‘controversy’. The development took place just a day before their bosses — chief secretary and inspector general of police Punjab — were to appear before the Election Commission Pakistan (ECP) to clarify their positions in respect of serious complaints of mismanagement and rigging in NA-75.

The ECP [on Feb 25] had summoned Punjab chief secretary Jawad Rafiq Malik and IGP Inam Ghani Khan to appear before the commission in person on March 4 (today) and the hearing would decide the fate of these officials.

As the day [March 4] approached fast, the CS and the IGP first removed Gujranwala division commissioner Gulzar Hussain Shah and regional police officer Riaz Nazir Gara on March 2.

Transfer of DPO by chief secretary violates police order

They had moved the summaries to the chief minister for the transfer/removal of the commissioner and the RPO.

Now, they made OSD the Sialkot DC and DPO apparently in a bid to satisfy or ‘placate’ the ECP as the commission had taken notice of the [rigging] complaints, particularly, when some presiding officers ‘disappeared’ with ballot boxes on the polling day, an official privy to the information told Dawn.

He said the action against the four senior officials kicked off a debate among the Pakistan Administrative Service (PAS) and the Police Service of Pakistan (PSP) officers who believed that the CS and the IGP were making their juniors ‘scapegoat.’

According to the notifications issued on Wednesday, the DC and the DPO have been directed to report to the Services & General Administration Department (S&GAD) for further orders.

The official said the Punjab government had made a ‘gross mistake’ while issuing notification of transfer of the DPO (BS-19) in violation of the Police Order 2002.

As per the Police Order 2002, powers would be exercised by the provincial police officer for the transfer of the DPO.

Sub section (1) of section 15 reads, “The provincial police officer may post a city police officer for a city district notified as a general police area and the DPO in a district within a general police area in consultation with the government”.

The official said the notification of the DPO issued by the S&GAD had sent a ‘message’ about the ‘weak position’ of the IGP in his command and control on departmental affairs.

He said it was for the first time during the last 18 years that the transfer order of a DPO was issued by the chief secretary.

Otherwise, the IGPs had been exercising the powers for the transfers of DPOs in consultation with the provincial government.

According to the police order, the IGP is authorised for the transfer of BS-19 police officer in consultation with the Punjab government and the notifications are issued with the signature of the DIG headquarters.

For BS-20 or above grade police officers, the notifications of transfers are issued by the S&GAD.

“It seems the CS and the IGP are making decisions in haste to avoid any possible embarrassment while appearing before the ECP in connection with the Daska by-election controversy. The [erstwhile] Sialkot DC and DPO are still in trouble as the ECP had also recommended to the Establishment Division to place them under suspension,” the official said.

In a related development on Wednesday, the IGP transferred and posted two BS-19 police officials. Of them AIG (operations) Punjab Ghazi Salahuddin was transferred and posted as AIG (finance) against an existing vacancy while AIG (training) Mohammad Zeeshan Raza was transferred and posted as AIG (operations).

As the notification in this respect was issued by the IGP, a senior police officer raised the question why he didn’t exercise this power in the Sialkot DPO case.

Published in Dawn, March 4th, 2021

Opinion

For whom the clock ticks
Updated 22 Apr 2021

For whom the clock ticks

Tarin will have to succeed in order to cement his position within the cabinet.
Ending the ‘forever war’
Updated 21 Apr 2021

Ending the ‘forever war’

Regardless of who the adversary was at any point, two generations of Afghans have known only war.

Editorial

22 Apr 2021

Capping power debt

THE suggested revision in the Circular Debt Management Plan, which aims to cap the flow or addition of new debt to...
22 Apr 2021

Istanbul postponement

WHILE the postponement of the Istanbul peace talks on Afghanistan, which were scheduled to be held later this week,...
22 Apr 2021

No mining precautions

YET another accident caused by a methane gas explosion has been reported from the dangerous coal mines of...
More mishandling
Updated 21 Apr 2021

More mishandling

By its bad decision-making and weak management, the govt has allowed the TLP to garner more importance and heft than it deserves.
21 Apr 2021

Declining FDI

THE sharp decline in FDI in recent months is worrisome. New State Bank data shows that FDI has plummeted by a hefty...
21 Apr 2021

The digital divide

IN the Economist Intelligence Unit’s annual Inclusive Internet Index report, measuring internet inclusion in terms...