SC holding daily hearing in Pearl murder case, SHC told

Published January 21, 2021
Daniel Pearl, 38, was abducted in Karachi in January 2002 while doing a research on religious extremism. — Dawn archives
Daniel Pearl, 38, was abducted in Karachi in January 2002 while doing a research on religious extremism. — Dawn archives

KARACHI: The Supreme Court is conducting day-to-day hearings on an appeal filed by the Sindh government challenging the decision of the Sindh High Court on the appeals of four men in US journalist Daniel Pearl’s abduction and murder case.

Advocate General Sindh Salman Talibuddin submitted this before a two-judge SHC bench during the hearing of an application moved by the four men seeking contempt proceedings against the provincial authorities for keeping them in detention despite their acquittal in the case.

Petitioners Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, Fahad Naseem, Salman Saqib and Sheikh Adil through their lawyers had moved the SHC last month seeking contempt proceedings against the provincial and jail authorities for not setting them free despite court orders.

In the last hearing, the bench had asked the provincial law officer to advance arguments as to whether the Supreme Court’s order still holds the field regarding detention of the four men.

On Wednesday, the AG appeared in court and submitted that the appeal against the acquittal of the petitioners was fixed before the SC, which was proceeding with the same on a day-to-day basis.

By consent of the parties, the bench adjourned the hearing till Feb 3.

Additional chief secretary for home Dr Mohammad Chachar, special secretary for home Aamir Abbasi and SSPs of the central prisons of Karachi and Sukkur Raja Mumtaz and Muhammad Hassan Sahito appeared before the bench.

An application for dispensation of attendance of the chief secretary for the day because of personal work was filed. The bench allowed the application.

On Jan 7, the provincial law officer had informed the SHC that the SC while hearing the appeals filed by the Sindh government and parents of the slain journalist against the SHC order for setting aside the trial court order on Sept 28 had issued a restraining order against the release of the petitioners till next hearing.

However, he had claimed that the restraining order of the SC still held the field since it had not been expressly vacated or varied by the apex court.

Published in Dawn, January 21st, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.