US has closed 10 bases in Afghanistan: WP

Published November 28, 2020
The report claimed that some bases had been completely handed over to Afghan security forces and others were vacated. — Reuters/File
The report claimed that some bases had been completely handed over to Afghan security forces and others were vacated. — Reuters/File

WASHINGTON: The Uni­ted States has closed at least 10 bases across Afghanistan since the signing of a deal with the Taliban in Feb­ruary, The Washington Post reported on Friday.

Quoting US and Afghan officials, the Post reported that the base closures were part of the complete withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan outlined in the deal.

The report claimed that some bases had been completely handed over to Afghan security forces and others were vacated but “left in place in a way in which they could be occupied again in the future,” if needed. “It is also unclear how much equipment is left at each of the closed installations,” the report added.

The Trump administration plans to bring down troop numbers from roughly 5,000 to 2,500 by Jan. 15, days before President Trump leaves office.

One US official told the Post that despite the withdrawal order the United States would like to “retain the ability to carry out airstrikes against the Taliban in defence of Afghan forces. US troops will also remain able to carry out some counterterrorism strikes against the Islamic State.”

As the withdrawal date drew close, the Pentagon was busy finalizing certain significant decisions, including “which other bases will close, what equipment will be turned over to the Afghan government, and how US equipment will be ticketed to leave.”

The decisions will be made in consultation with both NATO allies and Afghan partners, the Post added.

Recently, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg warned Washington that “an abrupt departure risks allowing Afghanistan to become a haven for terrorists.”

The government in Kabul hopes that the incoming Biden administration may not be as keen on pulling out troops as the outgoing Trump administration was and it would also be tougher on the Taliban.

The report pointed out that there were hundreds of US bases and outposts in Afghanistan at the height of the American military’s surge a decade ago, and dozens in recent years as the military shrunk its presence over time.

‘Further closures show that the United States is collapsing its forces in Afghanistan back into its bigger military installations to save on the large number of troops needed to secure the perimeter of multiple small outposts,” the Post added.

The bases closed soon after the US-Taliban deal, included Tarin Kowt in Uruzgan province, Bost in Helmand, Gamberi in Laghman and Lightning in Paktia. Others closed this year include Jones in Kunduz, DeAlencar in Nangahar, Shaheen in Balkh, Bishop in Kabul, Maymana in Faryab and Qalat in Zabul.

Even the bases that were once the largest in the country, like Kandahar Airfield and Jalalabad Air Base, now only housed a handful of US troops, the report added.

Published in Dawn, November 28th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Pathways to peace
Updated 27 Apr, 2026

Pathways to peace

NEGOTIATIONS to hammer out the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement took nearly two years before a breakthrough was achieved....
Food-insecure nation
27 Apr, 2026

Food-insecure nation

A NEW UN-backed report has listed Pakistan among 10 countries where acute food insecurity is most concentrated. This...
Migration toll
27 Apr, 2026

Migration toll

THE world should not be deceived by a global migration count lower than the highest annual statistics on record —...
Immunity gap
Updated 26 Apr, 2026

Immunity gap

Pakistan’s Big Catch-Up campaign showed progress but also exposed the scale of gaps in routine immunisation.
Danger on repeat
26 Apr, 2026

Danger on repeat

DISASTERS have typically been framed as acts of nature. Of late, they look increasingly like tests of preparedness...
Loose lips
26 Apr, 2026

Loose lips

PAKISTANIS have by now gained something of an international reputation for their gallows humour, but it seems that...