Sugar cartel won't be allowed to manipulate prices in future, assures PM Imran

Published November 12, 2020
Prime Minister Imran Khan speaks at the launching ceremony of the Naya Pakistan Certificate. — DawnNewsTV
Prime Minister Imran Khan speaks at the launching ceremony of the Naya Pakistan Certificate. — DawnNewsTV

Prime Minister Imran Khan on Thursday assured the nation that in the future, the government will not allow the sugar cartel to tamper with prices as he addressed rising inflation in the country.

The premier was speaking at the launching ceremony of the Naya Pakistan Certificate, which offers an investment opportunity to overseas Pakistanis with a Roshan Digital Account.

The ceremony was attended by notable government officials including Adviser to the Prime Minister on Finance Abdul Hafeez Sheikh, Minister for Industries Hammad Azhar and Minister for Economic Affairs Makhdoom Khusro Bakhtiar, among others.

In his address, Prime Minister Imran said that it was "unfortunate" that there was a sugar cartel in the country, adding that the competition commission had disclosed the practice and the government had taken steps to ensure that the industry does not manipulate the prices in future.

The prime minister acknowledged that prices of food commodities had increased but said that "all other indicators [of the economy] are positive". He said that it was not just Pakistan that was suffering from food inflation; neighbouring India was also facing the same challenge.

The reason behind the increase in food prices, he said, was that "supply chains had been affected due to coronavirus".

"On top of that, two of our wheat crops were affected due to climate change as it rained at the wrong time. [Therefore] our output was less than what we were expecting," he said.

He told participants of the ceremony that there had been no increase in the country's debts in the past four months. Furthermore, he said, Pakistan's current account balance in the previous quarter had gone into surplus for the first time in 17 years. He regretted that the development "had not been highlighted" by the media.

The premier also pointed out that the inflow of remittances has been on the rise due to "excellent incentives by the State Bank" and urged the central bank's governor, Reza Baqir, to continue efforts to ensure that overseas Pakistanis stack their money in Pakistan. The Naya Pakistan Certificate, the prime minister said, is an important step in this regard as it offers returns to overseas residents at a time when interest rates across the world had dropped.

He said that due to the increase in remittances, the rupee was getting stronger and the economy was stabilising "without any spending" by the government. The premier said that the economic situation of Pakistan would have been much better if the incumbent administration "did not have to bear the burden of past governments'" policies.

Earlier today, SBP data had revealed that remittances during the month of October had risen 14.1 per cent year-on-year to $2.3 billion, clocking in above the $2bn mark for the fifth consecutive month.

Opinion

Editorial

Election time
Updated 27 Jan, 2023

Election time

There are concerns whether the ECP will be sufficiently able to protect the integrity of elections if they are held under partisan governments.
SCO invite
27 Jan, 2023

SCO invite

THOUGH India’s invitation to Pakistan to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation events in Goa later this ...
Call to arms
27 Jan, 2023

Call to arms

ONE way the state abdicates responsibility in Pakistan is by farming out its functions to the private sector. In ...
Nuclear miscalculations
26 Jan, 2023

Nuclear miscalculations

IF the claim of former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo, that Pakistan and India came close to a nuclear exchange...
Exchange rate cap
26 Jan, 2023

Exchange rate cap

THE ‘management’ of the exchange rate by the State Bank, allegedly at the behest of the government, to ward off...
Fawad’s arrest
Updated 26 Jan, 2023

Fawad’s arrest

Does the state really need to fan public discontent in a period as fraught with uncertainty as this?