Notices issued to JPMC dept, others over delay in surgeries

Published September 29, 2020
he Sindh High Court on Monday issued notices to respondents in a petition against an inordinate delay in surgeries at the orthopaedic department of the Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre. — Dawn/File
he Sindh High Court on Monday issued notices to respondents in a petition against an inordinate delay in surgeries at the orthopaedic department of the Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre. — Dawn/File

Another division bench of the court was informed on Monday that the appointment orders of 81 physically challenged petitioners would be delivered to them before Oct 22.

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Monday issued notices to respondents in a petition against an inordinate delay in surgeries at the orthopaedic department of the Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC).

The petitioner submitted that he met with a road accident and got his leg fractured and the orthopaedic department of the JPMC asked him to come for surgery after one year.

A two-judge bench headed by Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar issued notices to the respondents and also directed the additional advocate general to call a senior official from the orthopaedic department on the next date of hearing.

The additional secretary of services, general administration and coordination (SGA&C) department, Umar Farooq, and Additional Advocate General Hakim Shaikh further assured the two-judge bench headed by Justice Nadeem Akhtar that the pending cases of 49 other petitioners regarding appointment would also be finalised before the next hearing.

When a petition seeking implementation of government job quota for physically challenged persons came up for hearing, the additional secretary through a compliance report informed the bench that out of 195 petitioners, 81 had been recommended for appointment, whereas 81 not recommended and the cases of remaining 63 were still pending.

The lawyers for petitioners, Nadeem Shaikh, Shoao-un-Nabi and others stated that the appointment orders had not been received by the 81 petitioners.

The additional secretary and the AAG undertook that the appointment orders would either be delivered to them before next date of hearing or would be produced before the bench on the next hearing.

Published in Dawn, September 29th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

On press freedoms
Updated 03 May, 2026

On press freedoms

THE citizenry forgets, to its own peril, how important a free and independent media is in the preservation of their...
Inflation strain
03 May, 2026

Inflation strain

PAKISTAN’S return to double-digit inflation after 21 months signals renewed economic strain where external shocks...
Troubled waters
03 May, 2026

Troubled waters

PAKISTAN’S water crisis is often framed in terms of scarcity. Increasingly, it is also a crisis of contamination....
Iran stalemate
Updated 02 May, 2026

Iran stalemate

THE US and Iran are currently somewhere between war and peace. While a tenuous ceasefire — extended largely due to...
Tax shortfall
02 May, 2026

Tax shortfall

THE Rs684bn shortfall in tax collection during the first 10 months of the fiscal year is a continuation of a...
Teaching inclusion
02 May, 2026

Teaching inclusion

DISCRIMINATORY and exclusionary content in Punjab’s textbooks has been flagged in Inclusive Education for a United...