Income support levy declared illegal by SHC

Published
0

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Thursday ruled that the levy imposed through the Income Support Levy Act, 2013 was ultra vires to the Constitution.

A two-judge bench headed by Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi said that the Income Support Levy Act, 2013 could not be introduced through the Finance Act, 2013 in terms of Article 73 of the Constitution.

The bench ruled, “The levy imposed though Income Support Levy Act, 2013 along with money bill, does not possess the characteristics of a tax, as it is not a common burden for raising revenue to be utilized for general public purpose, on the contrary, it is a levy in the nature of fund to be charged and utilized for a specific purpose i.e. to provide for financial resources for raising an income support fund for the economically distressed persons and their families”.

It further said that the income support levy was lacking the main characteristics of a tax and also discriminatory in nature since it created unreasonable classification within the same class of persons having net moveable assets exceeding Rs1 million.

The bench issued its verdict on over 500 petitions challenging the imposition of the income support levy at the rate of 0.5 per cent on the value of net moveable assets through Income Support Levy Act, 2013.

The bench declared that incidence and charge of levy falls unequally upon the existing taxpayers only, who file or are required to file wealth statement along with income tax returns under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. However, non-existing taxpayers, who are not required or do not file wealth statement and tax returns, in spite of having much higher net moveable wealth exceeding Rs1m, have been excluded from the incidence and charge of such levy, which is in clear violation of Article 25 of the Constitution, it added.

“All the notices and the proceedings, including assessment orders passed under Section 5 of the Income Support Levy Act, 2013 after repeal of Income Support Levy Act, 2013 under clause 10 of the Finance Act, 2014 in the absence of any saving or validation clause to protect or validate the Income Support Levy Act, 2013 are hereby declared to be without jurisdiction and lawful authority”, it concluded.

Published in Dawn, July 4th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Regional security
Updated 28 Oct, 2026

Regional security

Iran and the Makkah pact states should pledge not to let external actors use their soil to launch aggression against each other.
Rate hike
28 Oct, 2026

Rate hike

THE SBP’s decision to raise its policy rate by 50 basis points to 12pc was largely expected. It is also justified...
Press solidarity
28 Oct, 2026

Press solidarity

PAKISTAN’S journalists have seldom lacked organisations speaking in defence of press freedom. What has been ...
Privatisation framework
Updated 27 Oct, 2026

Privatisation framework

The proposed merger of the Privatisation Commission and the Public-Private Partnership Authority (P3A) into a single institution is a sensible move.
Chromebook scheme
Updated 27 Oct, 2026

Chromebook scheme

Technology can widen opportunity, but only when it is tied to good teaching, reliable connectivity and clear educational purpose.
Dengue season
27 Oct, 2026

Dengue season

ANOTHER dengue outbreak looms over the country for reasons of lack of preparedness and negligence. This month’s...