Plea seeking directive on complaint against PHC chief justice dismissed

Published March 7, 2020
The PHC CJ was one of the three judges who gave the verdict against Musharraf. — APP/File
The PHC CJ was one of the three judges who gave the verdict against Musharraf. — APP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking a directive for the Senate Secretariat to take a decision on a complaint against Peshawar High Court Chief Justice Waqar Ahmed Seth, one of the members of the special court that convicted former president Pervez Musharraf in the high treason case and awarded him death sentence.

The petitioner, advocate Mohammad Siddique Mirza, told the court that he had on Dec 23 filed a complaint with the Parliamentary Committee on Judges Appointment against Justice Seth since he authored a paragraph in the judgement of the treason case in which he ordered dragging the corpse of Mr Musharraf to D-Chowk (in front of parliament) if found dead and leaving it there hanging for three days.

However, it was a minority view as the two judges in the special court had expressed their disagreement over the paragraph and one of them had written a dissenting note.

Advocate Mirza informed the court that he had filed a complaint with the parliamentary committee constituted under Article 175-A of the Constitution and sought a review of the conduct of members of the special court seized with the high treason trial against Mr Musharraf.

He adopted in the petition that he requested the Senate secretary to arrange his meeting with the members of the parliamentary committee, but to no avail.

Subsequently, he requested for a directive to the Senate secretary “to arrange a meeting of the petitioner with the members of the parliamentary committee for preliminary hearing and disposal of complaint”.

Justice Minallah, however, observed that “despite his able assistance, he [the petitioner] could not show that the relief sought in the instant petition can be granted or the parliamentary committee constituted under Article 175-A of the Constitution is vested with jurisdiction to review the conduct of judicial officers”.

“Moreover, a right of appeal is provided before the august Supreme Court against the judgement rendered by the learned special court,” the court noted.

“For the above reasons, this petition is without merit and is, therefore, accordingly dismissed,” the court declared.

In December last year, the special court awarded death penalty to Mr Musharraf for imposing emergency in the country on Nov 3, 2007 and forcibly confining over 60 judges to their residences.

A Lahore High Court bench comprising Justice Syed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, Justice Muhammad Ameer Bhatti and Justice Chaudhry Masood Jahangir, however, set aside the conviction of Mr Musharraf.

The LHC bench also ruled that the amended Article 6 of the Constitution, under which Mr Musharraf had been found guilty, could not be applied in the case ‘ex post facto’ (retrospectively).

Published in Dawn, March 7th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Iran stalemate
Updated 02 May, 2026

Iran stalemate

THE US and Iran are currently somewhere between war and peace. While a tenuous ceasefire — extended largely due to...
Tax shortfall
02 May, 2026

Tax shortfall

THE Rs684bn shortfall in tax collection during the first 10 months of the fiscal year is a continuation of a...
Teaching inclusion
02 May, 2026

Teaching inclusion

DISCRIMINATORY and exclusionary content in Punjab’s textbooks has been flagged in Inclusive Education for a United...
Water vision
01 May, 2026

Water vision

WATER insecurity in Pakistan has been building up for decades as per capita water availability has declined from...
Vaccine policy
01 May, 2026

Vaccine policy

PAKISTAN has finally approved its first National Vaccine Policy; a step the health ministry has rightly described as...
Labour rights
Updated 01 May, 2026

Labour rights

THE annual observance of May Day should move beyond statements about the state’s commitment to the rights of...