'PML-N shouldn't have become part of undue haste' in passing tenure bills, says Rana Sanaullah

Published January 11, 2020
PML-N leader Rana Sanaullah addresses a press conference in Lahore. — DawnNewsTV
PML-N leader Rana Sanaullah addresses a press conference in Lahore. — DawnNewsTV

PML-N leader Rana Sanaullah on Saturday said that his party should not have "become a part of government's undue haste" in the passage of bills pertaining to the tenure of services' chiefs.

In a press conference held in Lahore, Sanaullah rejected perceptions that the PML-N had dropped its stance of "vote ko izzat do" (respect the vote).

"We stand by [our stance] of vote ko izzat do and civilian supremacy," he insisted, in response to a question.

When posed with questions regarding the swift passage of the bills with overwhelming support from the opposition, both in the National Assembly and Senate, Sanaullah said that none of the parties opposed the decision to extend the army chief's tenure.

"Had there not been undue haste in taking this decision [...] and our parliamentary party also became part of that undue haste which, we believe [...] was a bit of an error. We should not have become a part of the government's undue haste, instead, we should have stopped it," he said.

"In the message he sent, Nawaz Sharif said that 'do not become a part of undue haste which makes it look like this parliament has become a rubberstamp'."

A photo posted by Instagram (@instagram) on

He said that the opposition leaders who opposed the bill had objections over the process adopted by the government, not the army chief's extension.

Earlier this week, the National Assembly Standing Committee on Defence unanimously approved the three bills concerning tenures of the services chiefs and the chairman of joint chiefs of staff committee. They were then tabled in the National Assembly and were passed even though religious party members, including Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F), Jamaat-i-Islami and representatives from the erstwhile Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata), walked out of the NA declaring the lower house to be "fake".

The bills were then forwarded to the Senate, where they were passed in less than 30 minutes.

As per the amendments approved by both houses of Parliament, the appointment of the services chiefs and chairman, joint chiefs of the staff committee would be the prerogative of the prime minister and his decision to appoint, reappoint or extend the tenures of the chiefs and the chairman cannot be challenged in any court of law.

The upper age limit for a four-star appointment has been fixed at 64 years in case of reappointment and extension, otherwise the officer will retire at the age of 60 years.

The bills were moved by the government in the wake of a Supreme Court order issued in November last year, in which a three-judge bench had ruled that the parliament should pass legislation that would provide "certainty and predictability" to the post of the Chief of Army Staff for all times to come. The verdict was issued in a case pertaining to the prime minister's decision to grant a three-year extension to incumbent Army Chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.