Division bench recuses itself from lawyers’ pleas on bar’s request

Published December 17, 2019
On the previous hearing, Justice Ali Baqar Najafi had condemned the attack on PIC by a group of lawyers and observed that the incident brought a bad name to the judiciary. — Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons/File
On the previous hearing, Justice Ali Baqar Najafi had condemned the attack on PIC by a group of lawyers and observed that the incident brought a bad name to the judiciary. — Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons/File

LAHORE: A Lahore High Court division bench on Monday recused, on the request of the bar, from multiple petitions challenging FIRs and arrest of lawyers in the wake of the attack on the Punjab Institute of Cardiology (PIC) and referred them to the chief justice for fixation before any other bench.

The bench comprising Justice Ali Baqar Najafi and Justice Anwarul Haq Pannun resumed hearing in a courtroom packed to its capacity with lawyers and their leaders.

Lahore High Court Bar Association President Chaudhry Hafeezur Rehman requested the bench to transfer the case to some other bench.

Justice Najafi allowed the request and sent the files to Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Shamim for their fixation before any other appropriate bench.

Before the Monday’s hearing, Mr Rehman had also met the judges in chamber.

One of the judges was LHCBA president before elevation

Sources said the bar sought transfer of the case to save the judges from any controversy since Justice Pannun was holding office of the LHCBA’s president when he was elevated as judge of the LHC in 2018.

They said the bar had a view that it would not be appropriate in interest of justice if a former president of the bar heard a case directly relating to the lawyers.

On the previous hearing, Justice Najafi had condemned the attack on PIC by a group of lawyers and observed that the incident brought a bad name to the judiciary.

“We are hearing these petitions with great pain. We can transfer it forthwith if you say,” Justice Najafi had told the lawyers’ leaders.

He went on to say that it seemed law of jungle was prevailing in the country as lawyers attacked the PIC. He further said that no society could sustain under law of jungle.

Published in Dawn, December 17th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...
Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...