Division bench recuses itself from lawyers’ pleas on bar’s request

Published December 17, 2019
On the previous hearing, Justice Ali Baqar Najafi had condemned the attack on PIC by a group of lawyers and observed that the incident brought a bad name to the judiciary. — Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons/File
On the previous hearing, Justice Ali Baqar Najafi had condemned the attack on PIC by a group of lawyers and observed that the incident brought a bad name to the judiciary. — Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons/File

LAHORE: A Lahore High Court division bench on Monday recused, on the request of the bar, from multiple petitions challenging FIRs and arrest of lawyers in the wake of the attack on the Punjab Institute of Cardiology (PIC) and referred them to the chief justice for fixation before any other bench.

The bench comprising Justice Ali Baqar Najafi and Justice Anwarul Haq Pannun resumed hearing in a courtroom packed to its capacity with lawyers and their leaders.

Lahore High Court Bar Association President Chaudhry Hafeezur Rehman requested the bench to transfer the case to some other bench.

Justice Najafi allowed the request and sent the files to Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Shamim for their fixation before any other appropriate bench.

Before the Monday’s hearing, Mr Rehman had also met the judges in chamber.

One of the judges was LHCBA president before elevation

Sources said the bar sought transfer of the case to save the judges from any controversy since Justice Pannun was holding office of the LHCBA’s president when he was elevated as judge of the LHC in 2018.

They said the bar had a view that it would not be appropriate in interest of justice if a former president of the bar heard a case directly relating to the lawyers.

On the previous hearing, Justice Najafi had condemned the attack on PIC by a group of lawyers and observed that the incident brought a bad name to the judiciary.

“We are hearing these petitions with great pain. We can transfer it forthwith if you say,” Justice Najafi had told the lawyers’ leaders.

He went on to say that it seemed law of jungle was prevailing in the country as lawyers attacked the PIC. He further said that no society could sustain under law of jungle.

Published in Dawn, December 17th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

TECHNOLOGY divides us. According to a new UNDP report on Pakistan, titled Doing Digital for Development — Access,...
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...