Govt asks SC to extend deadline to comply with GB verdict

Published November 8, 2019
Supreme Court order requires government to carry out legislation for reforms in GB by tabling a bill in parliament. — AFP/File
Supreme Court order requires government to carry out legislation for reforms in GB by tabling a bill in parliament. — AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: The federal government has again sought time from the Supreme Court for implementing its Jan 17 verdict on grant of rights to the people of Gilgit-Baltistan (GB).

The government had also asked for time during an earlier hearing in May, but Additional Attorney General Sajid Ilyas Bhatti told a seven-judge Supreme Court bench, headed by Acting Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed, on Thursday that the matter was still under deliberation in the National Security Committee.

The acting chief justice cautioned the federal government to keep itself abreast of developments in the region and try to resolve the issue as early as possible lest some inimical forces take advantage of the situation.

The Supreme Court had taken up a case moved by the federal government through the Kashmir Affairs and Northern Areas Division seeking an extension in the deadline to comply with the Jan 17 judgement in which the Supreme Court had accorded approval to a freshly proposed presidential order enshrining a framework for governance in Gilgit-Baltistan.

The order required the government to carry out legislation for reforms in the province by tabling a bill in parliament.

One of the proposed amendments in the reforms is that the chief judge of the GB Supreme Appellate Court should nominate a judge for the court instead of the chief justice of Pakistan.

Revocation sought

Two Gilgit-based lawyers have moved a petition in the Supreme Court, seeking revocation of the federal government’s May 6 notification under which Syed Arshad Hussain Shah was appointed Chief Judge of the GB Supreme Appellate Court.

Latif Shah, vice chairman of the Gilgit-Baltistan Bar Council, and Kamal Hussain, president of the Gilgit-Baltistan High Court Bar Association, filed the petition through their counsel Salman Akram Raja. They pleaded that the federal government should respect the principle of judiciary’s independence while making appointments to the GB Supreme Appellate Court.

The petitioners also urged the apex court to direct the federal government to promulgate the GB Governance Reforms in accordance with its Jan 17 verdict.

They requested the court to restrain Chief Judge Syed Arshad Hussain from performing his duties during pendency of their petition by keeping the government’s May 6 notification suspended.

Published in Dawn, November 8th, 2019

Opinion

Enter the deputy PM

Enter the deputy PM

Clearly, something has changed since for this step to have been taken and there are shifts in the balance of power within.

Editorial

All this talk
Updated 30 Apr, 2024

All this talk

The other parties are equally legitimate stakeholders in the country’s political future, and it must give them due consideration.
Monetary policy
30 Apr, 2024

Monetary policy

ALIGNING its decision with the trend in developed economies, the State Bank has acted wisely by holding its key...
Meaningless appointment
30 Apr, 2024

Meaningless appointment

THE PML-N’s policy of ‘family first’ has once again triggered criticism. The party’s latest move in this...
Weathering the storm
Updated 29 Apr, 2024

Weathering the storm

Let 2024 be the year when we all proactively ensure that our communities are safeguarded and that the future is secure against the inevitable next storm.
Afghan repatriation
29 Apr, 2024

Afghan repatriation

COMPARED to the roughshod manner in which the caretaker set-up dealt with the issue, the elected government seems a...
Trying harder
29 Apr, 2024

Trying harder

IT is a relief that Pakistan managed to salvage some pride. Pakistan had taken the lead, then fell behind before...